<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>A new hot fix for Access 2007 is now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/2008/12/30/a-new-hot-fix-for-access-2007-is-now-available.aspx</link><description>Issues fixed include: You experience slower performance than you did in previous versions when you share a database file over a network. You may notice your database file increase in increments of 4 KB&amp;#160; without any user interaction when the database</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>A new hot fix for Access 2007 is now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/2008/12/30/a-new-hot-fix-for-access-2007-is-now-available.aspx#9259011</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 01:39:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9259011</guid><dc:creator>Tony's Microsoft Access Blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;A new hot fix for Access 2007 is now available But I shouldn&amp;amp;#39;t have needed to tell you this on my&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A new hot fix for Access 2007 is now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/2008/12/30/a-new-hot-fix-for-access-2007-is-now-available.aspx#9268678</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 12:22:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9268678</guid><dc:creator>CyrusB</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does anyone know if this hotfix can be rolled-back (i.e. without having to do a full re-install of MS Access)?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A new hot fix for Access 2007 is now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/2008/12/30/a-new-hot-fix-for-access-2007-is-now-available.aspx#9277720</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 10:05:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9277720</guid><dc:creator>Renaud Bompuis</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does this fix address the Runtime version as well? It doesn't seem to say whether it does or not in the notes.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: A new hot fix for Access 2007 is now available</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/access/archive/2008/12/30/a-new-hot-fix-for-access-2007-is-now-available.aspx#9285799</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:06:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9285799</guid><dc:creator>David Webb</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I've just upgraded from Access 2003 to Access 2007. I have alread installed the latest hotfix (960307).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I have a front-end mdb with a few small tables in it, and most of my large tables are in a back-end MySQL database using linked tables and views in Access. The big performance problem, compared with Access 2003 (which was good), is with combo boxes in datasheets. Navigating a datasheet (whether seperately or in a Form) is extremely slow, like wading through treacle. If I convert all the combo boxes to text boxes then the problem goes away - but then I am looking at raw identifiers (index keys) rather than data a human can use (like a company name). The difference from Access 2003 seems to be that each time you navigate to a new record on the datasheet, Access 2007 performs a new query on the linked table for all combo boxes, whereas &amp;nbsp;Access 2003 was smart enough to re-use the previous recordset since it &amp;quot;knows&amp;quot; that the lookup table for the combo box probably hasn't changed. That's my guess anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please can you let me know whether you are aware of this problem and if so what you are doing about it. It spoils an otherwise good product. &lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>