Saturday, August 20, 2005 10:32 AM
msracid
Designing for Chinese notions of privacy
It's a beautiful Saturday morning in Beijing's early Fall. I'm
brushing my teeth and hear a knock on the door followed by a curt
common in Mandarin. Assuming one of my roommates will answer the
door, I do nothing. A few seconds later the door opens and a
man's voice yells something in Mandarin that sounds like "Anybody
home?" I look into the hallway to see who it is. I don't
recognize him. He looks out of place, as if he doesn't know
anybody in our house. The man looks at me with a bit of surprise
and curiosity, then casually leaves our house... He's not a burglar and
his actions are not culturally inappropriate.
A few months ago we were interviewing a migrant workers and asked her
how she communicates with her children in her hometown. One way
is by snail mail. Remote villages cluster around small towns that
have markets and phones. The towns also have a post office where
a bag of mail is emptied onto a table and local residents are expected
to collect mail addressed to them. Apparently, it's common
practice for residents to open other people's mail to satisfy their
curiosity. Again, there's nothing really culturally inappropriate
with that. Perhaps it's even necessary for people to have
the ability to look through other people's mail. It's not too
difficult to imagine scenarios where this is the case.
I've been thinking about how to design socially appropriate and
meaningful interfaces, profiles, and privacy into products for emerging
markets here in China. This is especially important given that
many potential products designed for this population rely on shared
access. Can I inspect the mail of other users of this
computer? Should I be able to see other user's desktops as they
are using their system? Should we design systems assuming that
data will be read by third parties?
For one of our projects, a videomail kiosk for migrant workers, we
designed
systems so that third parties might be able to access messages (by
feigning login) but they were unable to delete messages. The
messages have a TTL of seven days. Though
it seems completely undesired to have other users potentially able to
read your mail, it may be a small price to pay for the target
user: they don't have to remember usernames or passwords. We do
have a login mechanism, but it consists of common knowledge like the
user's name and their hometown.
-neema