<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Nix the DataSet??????</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx</link><description>Some interesting comments from my entry on new DataSet features… Please nix the DataSet from the framework entirely and re-focus on the domain-oriented data access work you were doing prior to Tech-Ed 04. If that's not possible, please have the Visual</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Donot Nix the DataSet</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#397051</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:56:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:397051</guid><dc:creator>Sahil Malik : .Net Monkey</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Nix the DataSet??????</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#397070</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:397070</guid><dc:creator>Frans Bouma</dc:creator><description>What I miss in this whole story is the theoretical approach to the problem. I find it a little (just a little) dissapointing it is explained in technical terms, which is completely unnecessary. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;O/R mapping is the key technique to use if you want to work with single entity instances, and set of entity instances, but always the entity is the core building block.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Datasets are the key technique to use if you want to use relational model sets of data, i.e.: the set is the core building block. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's just set theory applied in different forms onto a fixed (DDL defined) schema. </description></item><item><title>re: Nix the DataSet??????</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#397178</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:14:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:397178</guid><dc:creator>Dave Foderick</dc:creator><description>Relational client side caches of unmaterialized objects, as  you describe them, are useless, IMHO. You would still need to flush the state to the database before doing the query that does the projection. I like a projection to return arrays of objects as you have already mentioned. An ObjectView class can wrap the collection and provide the databinding support. Having said all that, I do use DataSets currently to reshape my domain model to the presentation model, but this is only because the tools are not currently here yet to databind to a domain model in a sophisticated way .I would much prefer to have an updatable projection.</description></item><item><title>Relational people vs. object people</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#402408</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:47:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:402408</guid><dc:creator>Panopticon Central</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Relational people vs. object people</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#402409</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:49:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:402409</guid><dc:creator>Panopticon Central</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Nix the DataSet??????</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#402441</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 03:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:402441</guid><dc:creator>kai</dc:creator><description>you should humber your self, learn, then, learn again, and learn again. Be honest. Do not pretend you know. -- Learn CSLA (Rocky's framework), learn NHibernet. Use them to create some real applications. Better, learn Java. Java does not have dataset, so, it will give you some idea how things work in a real world enterprise level system. ---- You are suppose to know those things when you post; not some &amp;quot;theories&amp;quot;, an undergraduate knows those stupid theries. Do not wast everybody's time!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! </description></item><item><title>re: Nix the DataSet??????</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#402447</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Mar 2005 04:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:402447</guid><dc:creator>kai again</dc:creator><description>Scott is an old friend from the ObjectSpaces days, so I think he is partially kidding. And I can’t say I totally disagree with him WRT the typed DataSet because I think it has been shown that O/R solutions can do better then code generation.  But that is a different topic for a different time.&lt;br&gt;-------thanks for providing the link; however, I'm puzzled, why you do not learn from him?????&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>DataSet Links</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#438330</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:22:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:438330</guid><dc:creator>.Net Adventures </dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>笔记：使用自定义实体类和集合代替DataSet</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#445853</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2005 04:29:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:445853</guid><dc:creator>Blade7</dc:creator><description>Ping Back来自：blog.csdn.net</description></item><item><title>使用自定义实体类和集合代替DataSet</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#749495</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:06:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:749495</guid><dc:creator>jelink</dc:creator><description>asp.net</description></item><item><title>re: Nix the DataSet??????</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#1394765</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2007 00:04:33 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1394765</guid><dc:creator>Greg Finzer</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I recently wrote an article on the advantages of business objects over datasets. &amp;nbsp;Please visit and let me know what you think.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.kellermansoftware.com/t-articlebusinessobjects.aspx"&gt;http://www.kellermansoftware.com/t-articlebusinessobjects.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>掌握 ASP.NET 之路：自定义实体类简介</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#2083506</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 11:35:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:2083506</guid><dc:creator>Kris - TECH</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;摘要： 有些情况下，非类型化的 DataSet 可能并非数据操作的最佳解决方案。本指南的目的就是探讨 DataSet 的一种替代解决方案，即：自定义实体与集合。（本文包含一些指向英文站点的链接。） 本页内容&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>DataSet vs Custom Entity 阅读资料</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#5290878</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Oct 2007 13:31:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5290878</guid><dc:creator>Joycode@Ab110.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;上一篇blog还是在6月底写的，然后就是第一年的performance review，再有beta版的开发工作，一直都没有更新。 到今天Windows Live Data的Beta基本已尘埃落定（其实两周前已经code&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>使用自定义实体类和集合代替DataSet</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#5466517</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 05:36:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5466517</guid><dc:creator>尹智玲</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/china/msdn/library/webservices/asp.net/custentcls.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/china/msdn/library/webservices/asp.net/custentcls.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;【另】：更多参考资料和链接也见原文，强...&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>DataSets vs. Collections</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#6974511</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 05:57:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6974511</guid><dc:creator>Mainz</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Both DataSets and custom classes don't limit what you can do in any way, and both can be used to accomplish the same aims. That said, DataSets are fantastic tools for prototyping applications and represent excellent solutions for building systems in a&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>DataSet Links | devintelligence.com</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/aconrad/archive/2005/03/16/396999.aspx#8769181</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:37:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8769181</guid><dc:creator>DataSet Links | devintelligence.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www19.a2hosting.com/~tarasn/devintelligence.com/?p=695"&gt;http://www19.a2hosting.com/~tarasn/devintelligence.com/?p=695&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>