<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>What you wish for</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adamsinger/archive/2006/05/26/608196.aspx</link><description>As I depart the Version Control team, I'd like to make one final note about a particular request we've heard often. Many folks want us to get the latest version of a file when they check it out for editing. On the surface, this does seem like a good idea.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: What you wish for</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adamsinger/archive/2006/05/26/608196.aspx#608263</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 22:19:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:608263</guid><dc:creator>Keith Hill</dc:creator><description>I don't want &amp;quot;get latest on checkout&amp;quot; by default. &amp;nbsp;As long as we get a very obvious indication that there is a newer version in the repository than the version I just pended an edit on, then I'm more than happy. &amp;nbsp;In fact, I would argue that the TFS team kind of did this to themselves by calling the action &amp;quot;checkout&amp;quot; instead of &amp;quot;edit&amp;quot; like Subversion does. &amp;nbsp;Many people expect a &amp;quot;checkout&amp;quot; to do a get &amp;amp; lock and checkout does neither in TFVC.</description></item><item><title>re: What you wish for</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adamsinger/archive/2006/05/26/608196.aspx#608268</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 22:27:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:608268</guid><dc:creator>Adam Singer</dc:creator><description>Actually, we do currently write out some information to the Output window when you checkout a file which is either out of date or has pending changes in other workspaces. It's certainly not front-and-center, but the info should be made available. I should note that VC had some issues instantiating the output trace in some cases, but I think that's being worked on, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for the name, it's certainly always a struggle to find the right terminology for something given the current language in use- particularly given functional differences. I wasn't here yet when the command names were decided upon, but I'm guessing they decided to call it &amp;quot;checkout&amp;quot; to contrast nicely with &amp;quot;checkin&amp;quot; as those are two of the most basic version control operations. Still, that is a very good point.</description></item><item><title>VSTS Links - 05/30/2006</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adamsinger/archive/2006/05/26/608196.aspx#610850</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 18:52:08 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:610850</guid><dc:creator>Team System News</dc:creator><description>Rob Caron blogs about a Team System TestRun Report Viewer and Ensuring Team Foundation Server Availability....</description></item></channel></rss>