<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>EDM Tools | Options (Part 3 of 4)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/26/edm-tools-options-part-3-of-4.aspx</link><description>Introduction In parts one and two of this four-part series, we discussed the file differences between EDMX &amp;amp; csdl, ssdl &amp;amp; msl files, and we looked at the model &amp;amp; code generation APIs available in the .Net Runtime. In Part three, we discuss</description><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>ADO.NET team blog : EDM Tools | Options (Part 2 of 4)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/26/edm-tools-options-part-3-of-4.aspx#8658458</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:42:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8658458</guid><dc:creator>ADO.NET team blog : EDM Tools | Options (Part 2 of 4)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/20/edm-tools-options-part-2-of-4.aspx"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/20/edm-tools-options-part-2-of-4.aspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: EDM Tools | Options (Part 3 of 4)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/26/edm-tools-options-part-3-of-4.aspx#8659557</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 05:43:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8659557</guid><dc:creator>Jimmy Bogard</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd like to make a small suggestion, that the validation be put inside a unit test. &amp;nbsp;That way, every time you run your automated build, you'll get immediate feedback on the validity of your model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even better, part of a full continuous integration process, so the entire team knows if someone broke the model.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'm not picky, so you could do all of this with MSTest and Team Build 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;View generation could also be part of your automated build, as it's very easy to call an executable from both major build technologies. &amp;nbsp;That way, whatever gets deployed has the views ready to go. &amp;nbsp;No human intervention needed. &amp;nbsp;Whether or not you'd want to commit the generated views back to source control is debatable.&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: EDM Tools | Options (Part 3 of 4)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/26/edm-tools-options-part-3-of-4.aspx#8675526</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 09:21:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8675526</guid><dc:creator>Sergey B.</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, guys!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When are you planning to release ADO.NET EF and Tools?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tnx&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>EDM Tools | Options (Part 4 of 4)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/26/edm-tools-options-part-3-of-4.aspx#8731777</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:16:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8731777</guid><dc:creator>ADO.NET team blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Introduction In parts one , two and three of this four-part series, we discussed the file differences&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Model &amp; Code Generation Uncovered</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/adonet/archive/2008/06/26/edm-tools-options-part-3-of-4.aspx#9724814</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:06:31 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9724814</guid><dc:creator>Tool Time</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Last summer, the senior developer on the Entity Designer team (Mike Kaufman) wrote a series of blog posts&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>