<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/atom.xsl" media="screen"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-US"><title type="html">Sonu Aggarwal</title><subtitle type="html">Microsoft Unified Communications</subtitle><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/atom.xml</id><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/default.aspx" /><link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/atom.xml" /><generator uri="http://communityserver.org" version="2.1.61025.2">Community Server</generator><updated>2007-11-29T23:29:00Z</updated><entry><title>Interoperability Scenarios with Voice Partners</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/12/13/interoperability-scenarios-with-voice-partners.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/12/13/interoperability-scenarios-with-voice-partners.aspx</id><published>2007-12-14T00:28:00Z</published><updated>2007-12-14T00:28:00Z</updated><content type="html">In my previous post, I talked about our long term goals for partnering with PBX vendors etc. on Voice – Hardware solutions, Vertical solutions, service providers for key scenarios, and Services. A key near-term need is interoperability with existing PBX infrastructure, and that is where much of our Voice Partner execution has recently focused. Under the umbrella “ Open Interoperability Program ”, this spans 3 key interop scenarios Partners are currently delivering – Media Gateways, Remote Call Control,...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/12/13/interoperability-scenarios-with-voice-partners.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6765065" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>aggarwal</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/aggarwal.aspx</uri></author></entry><entry><title>Microsoft’s Voice Partner Landscape – the “what” and “why”</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/12/06/microsoft-s-voice-partner-landscape-the-what-and-why.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/12/06/microsoft-s-voice-partner-landscape-the-what-and-why.aspx</id><published>2007-12-07T03:32:00Z</published><updated>2007-12-07T03:32:00Z</updated><content type="html">A common question I get from customers, and those following the MSFT UC space, is: what are MSFT’s goals in partnering with PBX vendors on Voice? (E.g. Om Malik , Blair Pleasant , Jim Burton , and Eileen Brown …) With OCS 2007 and subsequent releases going forward, Microsoft aspires to be able to provide the main voice backbone, as well as the main voice user experience, for its enterprise customers. As hinted by Jeff Raikes’ prediction of 100 million end-users accessing VoIP through Office applications...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/12/06/microsoft-s-voice-partner-landscape-the-what-and-why.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6686825" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>aggarwal</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/aggarwal.aspx</uri></author><category term="Unified Communications" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/tags/Unified+Communications/default.aspx" /><category term="Voice Partners" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/tags/Voice+Partners/default.aspx" /></entry><entry><title>Unified Communications &amp; I</title><link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/11/29/unified-communications-i.aspx" /><id>http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/2007/11/29/unified-communications-i.aspx</id><published>2007-11-30T02:29:00Z</published><updated>2007-11-30T02:29:00Z</updated><content type="html">&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;FONT size=3&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri&gt;Hi, I’m Sonu Aggarwal, and this is my first post, where I’d like to take this opportunity to introduce myself and the space I’m going to be covering here.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri size=3&gt;I am currently the Director of Technical Strategy and Partnerships for Unified Communications at Microsoft.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;I have been involved with the Real-Time Communications space for a long time… I co-invented the first-ever enterprise IM technology in 1996 with classmates from MIT at my first startup Flash Communications, which was acquired by Microsoft&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;to seed its efforts in Real-Time Collaboration; I have been involved with the RTC space almost continuously since.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Most recently, as Group Program Manager for the Office Communications Server group, I was responsible for coordinating the roadmap, feature set, and execution for all Server aspects of Office Communications Server 2007.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;(Further details about my professional background are &lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/sonuag" mce_href="http://www.linkedin.com/in/sonuag"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri color=#800080 size=3&gt;here&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri size=3&gt;.)&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri size=3&gt;In my current role, I lead a team that drives our Partner technical engagement with Microsoft’s Unified Communications Partners, such as Nortel, Cisco, and a large set of other Partners.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;My blog here will focus on clarifying some common and rather fundamental questions I get from customers and Partners about our Partner direction in this exciting space.&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;Depending on reader interest, we may also broaden into Office Communications Server product line in general.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt"&gt;&lt;FONT face=Calibri size=3&gt;Meanwhile, keep the discussion coming!&lt;SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;I can’t promise an answer to every query right away, but it’ll help identify topics that I ought to shed light on sooner rather than later…&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P class=MsoNormal style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" mce_keep="true"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Technorati tags: &lt;A href="http://technorati.com/tag/unified+communications"&gt;Unified Communications&lt;/A&gt; , &lt;A href="http://technorati.com/tag/Microsoft+UC+Partners"&gt;Microsoft UC Partners&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6606505" width="1" height="1"&gt;</content><author><name>aggarwal</name><uri>http://blogs.msdn.com/members/aggarwal.aspx</uri></author><category term="Sonu Aggarwal" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/tags/Sonu+Aggarwal/default.aspx" /><category term="Unified Communications" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/tags/Unified+Communications/default.aspx" /><category term="Introduction" scheme="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggarwal/archive/tags/Introduction/default.aspx" /></entry></feed>