<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Scaling up agile: software product lines</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alan_cameron_wills/archive/2004/04/13/112431.aspx</link><description>Don't do big projects. Small ones have a lot more chance of success. In a small group, people are more likely to understand the overall requirements and architecture, so they understand better how their work fits into the whole thing. They don't need</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Software Factories and Product Lines</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alan_cameron_wills/archive/2004/04/13/112431.aspx#140199</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 14:23:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:140199</guid><dc:creator>Michael Platt's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>Software Factories and Product Lines</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alan_cameron_wills/archive/2004/04/13/112431.aspx#140202</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2004 14:25:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:140202</guid><dc:creator>Michael Platt's WebLog</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>New (to me) Architecture/Modeling Blog</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alan_cameron_wills/archive/2004/04/13/112431.aspx#158275</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 18:51:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:158275</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Donnici</dc:creator><description /></item><item><title>re: Scaling up agile: software product lines</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alan_cameron_wills/archive/2004/04/13/112431.aspx#164042</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2004 05:01:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:164042</guid><dc:creator>Howard Z.</dc:creator><description>I would like to see software products that have use adjustable tuner for features and their sophistication.  The application can then adapt accordingly when the settings are changed.   The application can do that by dynamically downloading different versions of different components and assembling them on the fly.  Factory patterns and reflection can be used in the core application framework to make this re-configuration a simple matter of downloading different versions of same  assemblies.   This will make possible a true pay as you go and pay as per your need and help to combat the often criticized bloating of features in products such as MS office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title> Alan Cameron Wills Domain Specific Languages Scaling up agile | Paid Surveys</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alan_cameron_wills/archive/2004/04/13/112431.aspx#9650682</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 02:31:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9650682</guid><dc:creator> Alan Cameron Wills Domain Specific Languages Scaling up agile | Paid Surveys</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=alan-cameron-wills-domain-specific-languages-scaling-up-agile"&gt;http://paidsurveyshub.info/story.php?title=alan-cameron-wills-domain-specific-languages-scaling-up-agile&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>