<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Attention podcast part 2, Joshua Porter and Alex Barnett</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alexbarn/archive/2005/11/26/497205.aspx</link><description>Here's the second of the two part Attention podcast Skype call I recorded with Joshua Porter : Part 2: .(mp3, 46mb, 48min) Part 1 notes ( .mp3, 43mb, 45min) We've already got some feedback to the first half/part of the podcast. In particular I wanted</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Attention podcast part 2, Joshua Porter and Alex Barnett</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alexbarn/archive/2005/11/26/497205.aspx#497299</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2005 02:08:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:497299</guid><dc:creator>scott</dc:creator><description>How do you see these user developed OPML psuedo standards getting established? Will the tool vendors be the king makers? Won't this process lead to the big industry players in each vertical market hijacking OPML in the same manner that Apple hijacked RSS 2.0 with their iTunes extensions? Podcasting innovation has been stopped in its tracks because there was nothing in place to prevent Apple from doing whatever it wanted, however it wanted. I think end users will lose out in the scenario you are proposing.</description></item></channel></rss>