Beginning of the Attention Engine race

re: Beginning of the Attention Engine race

Matt — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:29:58 GMT

Alex, your personal version is ready at http://www.megite.com/index.php?section=alexbarnett

re: Beginning of the Attention Engine race

Nik Cubrilovic — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:39:53 GMT

<i>but the end result is pretty good..<br />

..<br />

What's the algorithm at work here? Is there one beyond randomization? .. </i>

Make up your mind, either it is good or it is just random. You got what you say yourself are some random results but somehow this is all 'going to be great'? c'mon.

My thoughts are on my blog

Rohit Aggarwal » Blog Archive » Repost:Beginning of the Attention engine race

Rohit Aggarwal » Blog Archive » Repost:Beginning of the Attention engine race — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:38:15 GMT

PingBack from http://rohitaggarwal.wordpress.com/2006/02/14/repostbeginning-of-the-attention-engine-race/

re: Beginning of the Attention Engine race

Greg Linden — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:59:41 GMT

Hi, Alex. Thanks for trying Findory!

The relevance rank is not random nor is it solely based on your OPML file. Findory decides what is relevant based on the articles you read.

Play with it, click a few articles, and watch how it focuses in. Findory learns very quickly.

Hope you enjoy it!

re: Beginning of the Attention Engine race

alexbarn — Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:24:24 GMT

Matt: Brilliant, thanks! Am playing with right now...

Nik: A page that takes into account my interests in better than one that doesn't. But randomizing the posts on a page is not really interesting. That's my point. I think I wrote that. I read your post too. I disagree. I'll write up why later.

Greg: Sounds like you're using clickstream to augment the Attention data. Will play more.

thanks.

re: Beginning of the Attention Engine race

Kevin Burton — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 02:13:22 GMT

Dude... I got your back ! :)

TailRank has had this live for 2 weeks now.

It was as soft launch though as I'm working on some more functionality here.

We actually reworked this from before (as I'm sure you're aware)...

Kevin

Projected Identity, The Database, and Deleuze & Guattari in Web 2.0

Swarming Media — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:25:17 GMT

The following is a continuation of the connections between new media network interaction and Deleuze & Guattari's concepts in A Thousand Plateaus. That said, while it doesn't directly mention many other topics bouncing around online communities, parts

Personalized Clustering: It's too hard, say developers

Read/WriteWeb — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:23:25 GMT

After my post about Personalized Megite, I got taken to task by both Gabe Rivera from Memeorandum and Nik Cubrilovic from OmniDrive - two developers who have had a lot of experience trying to develop such systems. As Gabe wrote...

Raw » Personalised Filtering

Raw » Personalised Filtering — Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:52:48 GMT

PingBack from http://dannyayers.com/archives/2006/02/15/personalised-filtering/

Attention engines - screencast

Alex Barnett blog — Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:57:34 GMT

I created a quick screencast to show what I mean by the term 'Attention Engines'.
Before I sign out...

BillyBLOGirlardo » Blog Archive » Nice To Know My Comments Were The Same

BillyBLOGirlardo » Blog Archive » Nice To Know My Comments Were The Same — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 00:55:31 GMT

PingBack from http://billy-girlardo.com/WP/2006/02/25/nice_to_know_my_comments_were_the_same/

Nik Cubrilovic » Memetracking Attempts at Old Issues

Nik Cubrilovic » Memetracking Attempts at Old Issues — Mon, 17 Apr 2006 11:24:12 GMT

PingBack from http://www.nik.com.au/archives/2006/02/14/memetracking-attempts-at-old-issues/

Womens Discount Perfume » Not pleasures perfume but still interesting…

Womens Discount Perfume » Not pleasures perfume but still interesting… — Wed, 31 Oct 2007 03:00:56 GMT

PingBack from http://discount-perfume-hq.com/?p=2105