<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Performance Sin - Chatty Database Access And Loops (Plus Another Free Performance Tool)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx</link><description>Chatty database access is the surefire way for slow performance caused by&amp;#160; resources starvation that might&amp;#160; even lead to denial of service. Following is a real world case. Customer Service Unavailable message is consistently observed when there</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Performance Sin - Chatty Database Access And Loops (Plus Another Free </title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8435861</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 21:18:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8435861</guid><dc:creator>DotNetKicks.com</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>ASP.NET Performance Sin - Serving Images Dynamically (Or Another Reason To Love Fiddler)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8450462</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 16:12:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8450462</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin's</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Serving images dynamically may cause performance hit. Dynamically served images require more HTTP requests&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>sqlprofiler : Profiler pour SQL Server 2005 Express Edition</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8455569</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 19:45:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8455569</guid><dc:creator>CoqBlog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Je viens de d&amp;#233;couvrir cet outil au d&amp;#233;tour d'un post d'Alik Levin . Comme son nom l'indique, son but est&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Improve ASP.NET Performance With Multithreading Using Thread Or ThreadPool Objects</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8641773</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 13:27:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8641773</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin's</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Your ASP.NET application performs slower than expected? How many times do you access your database for&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>Best ASP.NET Performance Winner For Data Binding - Hands Up To Response.Write()</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8793255</link><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:30:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8793255</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin's</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;amp;#160;&amp;amp;#160;&amp;amp;#160;&amp;amp;#160; To achieve best performance you need to make decisions based on trade-off between&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ASP.NET Data Binding Performance – Collection Is More Expensive Than Datatable</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8798960</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:19:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8798960</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin's</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;amp;#160;&amp;amp;#160;&amp;amp;#160; In my previous post -&amp;amp;#160; Best ASP.NET Performance Winner For Data Binding - Hands&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ASP.NET Data Binding Performance – Collection Is More Expensive Than Datatable</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#8799077</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:41:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8799077</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin's</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In my previous post - Best ASP.NET Performance Winner For Data Binding - Hands Up To Response.Write()&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>ASP.NET Performance Engineering - Stress Test Your Architecture, Design, And Code</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2008/04/28/performance-sin-chatty-database-access-and-loops-plus-another-free-performance-tool.aspx#9028093</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 15:22:26 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9028093</guid><dc:creator>Alik Levin's</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Field experience proves - the earlier performance is tackled in development lifecycle the better results&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>