<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Distributed Architecture Drawbacks Revealed By Netmon(Bonus - TDS Parser Goes Public)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2009/03/13/distributed-architecture-drawbacks-revealed-by-netmon-bonus-tds-parser-goes-public.aspx</link><description>&amp;#160; &amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160; Distributed architecture can mercilessly backfire at you.&amp;#160; In my case flexible architecture, elegant design patterns, and smart code led to abuse of the flexibility, resulting in very poor performance . Free Microsoft Network</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Distributed Architecture Drawbacks Revealed By Netmon(Bonus - TDS Parser Goes Public)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2009/03/13/distributed-architecture-drawbacks-revealed-by-netmon-bonus-tds-parser-goes-public.aspx#9473106</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:59:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9473106</guid><dc:creator>Jimmy May</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Alik, this is an excellent case study which documents not only fundamentals of analysis, diagnosis, &amp;amp; remediation, but also &amp;amp; perhaps more importantly that we oughtn't jump on the latest-&amp;amp;-greatest simply because either 1) marketeering hype &amp;amp;/or 2) that the latest-&amp;amp;-greatest often isn't actually the greatest.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Distributed Architecture Drawbacks Revealed By Netmon(Bonus - TDS Parser Goes Public)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/alikl/archive/2009/03/13/distributed-architecture-drawbacks-revealed-by-netmon-bonus-tds-parser-goes-public.aspx#9473130</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 16:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9473130</guid><dc:creator>alikl</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Jimmy,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks for good words.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I am actually fine with 1) and 2). What bothers me the most is in many cases folks are just throwing tools/money/CPU/RAM on problems; it never helps in long run. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Approach matters. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Look what a great quote I found here:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid92_gci1330283,00.html"&gt;http://searchsoftwarequality.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid92_gci1330283,00.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Application performance is not an event or something you do once — it's a practice.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mark Kremer&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CEO, Precise Software Solutions Inc.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;GOLD!&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>