<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx</link><description>Those tracking the XPS specification should have noticed that in v.75 we introduced Windows Media Photo as a supported image format in XPS (look on page 12). Windows Media Photo is a new image format in Windows, but is also supported on other platforms.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#606790</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 07:59:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:606790</guid><dc:creator>JD on EP</dc:creator><description>Windows Media Photo: When I read this at CNET, I stared at my screen for awhile: &amp;amp;quot;If it is up to Microsoft, the omnipresent JPEG image format will be replaced by Windows Media Photo. The software maker detailed the new image format Wednesday at the</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#607739</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 07:51:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:607739</guid><dc:creator>SK</dc:creator><description>So Microsoft has this vision that all media formats be it Photo, Movie, Music, Documents all fall under the umbrella of Windows Media X. &amp;nbsp;Kind of a sad future, when there are no choices or opportunties for diversity.</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#607742</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 07:55:28 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:607742</guid><dc:creator>SK</dc:creator><description>Yet Another Patent Encumbered Proprietary Closed Microsoft Format To Ensure Vendor Lock-In And Lack Of Interoperability. </description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#607872</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 12:06:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:607872</guid><dc:creator>Alaun Wraein</dc:creator><description>&lt;br&gt;Remember the .GIF debacle ?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is just yet another attempt by a corporation to get their patent bearing format into your software.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I hope this fails miserably.&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#608028</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 17:23:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:608028</guid><dc:creator>bubu</dc:creator><description>Is there any SDK available to read/write this kind of images in WindosXP?</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#608091</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 18:38:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:608091</guid><dc:creator>james johnston</dc:creator><description>jpeg is patented just as much as gif is and probably as much as WDP will be. Microsoft have too much to lose over limiting the use of this new format. As far as i can see its not closed, theres little or nothing to stop it being ported to linux/mac - and ms may even help with this (no image format will ever take off if photoshop on the mac doesnt support it)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;jpg IS old hat and DOES need replacing - microsoft is the only one with the balls, the sense and the skill at the moment to do it properly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;at the end of the day, wma and wmv are AMAZING formats, well supported on other platforms (not quite as well as divx et el - but ARE supported) and are at least as good as their 'open' counterparts. all in all I cant wait till this is available. </description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#608215</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2006 21:44:01 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:608215</guid><dc:creator>Andy Simonds</dc:creator><description>Thanks for the comments James. &amp;nbsp;Yes, we are not trying to take over the world with our image format. &amp;nbsp;Just offering a more capable format that solves real problems, if people like it - great! If you hate - then hate it because of it's capabilities or lack thereof - not because it comes from Microsoft. &amp;nbsp;It will be supported cross platform, we are very passionate about making that happen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Andy</description></item><item><title>Windows Media Photo - JPG alternative? JPG-2000 killer?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#610131</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 May 2006 18:21:39 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:610131</guid><dc:creator>Robert Burke's Weblog</dc:creator><description>&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;Have you heard of the&amp;amp;amp;nbsp;Windows Media Photo specification?&amp;amp;amp;nbsp; Neither had I, until today!...</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#611132</link><pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2006 00:27:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:611132</guid><dc:creator>mts</dc:creator><description>The examples shown at Winhec 2006 were impressive, especially so when the differences between compressed and original images were examined. &amp;nbsp;The ability of .wdp to randomize these differences in contrast with JPEG that concentrates them into edges and high-detail portions of the image is important and impressive. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What is missing is a good technical discussion of the compression algorithm and a comparison with the JPEG-2K wavelet and JPEG-FFT methods. &amp;nbsp;Especially valuable might be some 2D FFT comparisons between the methods in transform space.</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#661476</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jul 2006 19:05:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:661476</guid><dc:creator>Rui Ribeiro</dc:creator><description>It seems that Windows Media Photo is a product that is being developed very near to Windows Media Services. Will it be able to use the same DRM infrastructure? Will content producers (photographs) be able to register their photo on a DRM based on Windows Media system?</description></item><item><title>re: XPS and Windows Media Photo</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#661896</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jul 2006 05:18:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:661896</guid><dc:creator>billcrow</dc:creator><description>Hi Rui,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While Windows Media Photo uses the &amp;quot;Windows Media&amp;quot; branding, and is licensed to device partners under terms similar to our other Windows Media technology, it does not use the ASF container structure or any DRM technology. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Windows Media DRM is ideal for publishing audio and video, but is really not that useful for still photography. &amp;nbsp;Most commercial scenarios for digital photos require that the customer receive direct access to the image, which basically defeats the approach used by Windows Media DRM (where the goal is to protect the content all the way to the glass or speakers.) &amp;nbsp;Also, Windows Media DRM is designed for a &amp;quot;few to many&amp;quot; publishing model; the DRM license gerneration technology does not easily allow anyone to generate their own DRM licenses. &amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While we are looking at DRM for photos for possible support in the future, the initial implementation was deliberately been designed to be simple, lightweight and easy for partners to implement directly in devices. &amp;nbsp; That said, you can currently use Windows Document Rights Management for very effective management of rights access to digital photos. &amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We're investigating more comprehensive solutions to manage digital photo access rights, copyright protection and provenance guarantees as features for future versions of Windows Media Photo.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bill Crow&lt;br&gt;Windows Media Photo Program Manager&lt;br&gt;</description></item><item><title>JPEG Killer - Windows Media Photo or HD Photo - TechEnclave</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#1558010</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 21:01:02 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1558010</guid><dc:creator>JPEG Killer - Windows Media Photo or HD Photo - TechEnclave</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.techenclave.com/forums/jpeg-killer-windows-media-photo-hd-85799.html#post540156"&gt;http://www.techenclave.com/forums/jpeg-killer-windows-media-photo-hd-85799.html#post540156&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title> Andy Simonds Blog XPS and Windows Media Photo | Green Tea Fat Burner</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/andy_simonds/archive/2005/10/06/477954.aspx#9706116</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 04:57:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9706116</guid><dc:creator> Andy Simonds Blog XPS and Windows Media Photo | Green Tea Fat Burner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://greenteafatburner.info/story.php?id=5224"&gt;http://greenteafatburner.info/story.php?id=5224&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>