<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exception instead of NotImplementedException</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx</link><description>A number of people have expressed confusion and concern as to why C# code generation will insert an Exception with the text ‘the method or operation is not implemented,’ instead of simply generating a NotImplementedException. For example, if you create</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2.1 SP1 (Build: 61025.2)</generator><item><title>re: Exception instead of NotImplementedException</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#503363</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 02:24:37 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:503363</guid><dc:creator>Sean Chase</dc:creator><description>Thanks for this!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTW - you need to change the ID element value in your example to...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&amp;lt;ID&amp;gt;NotImplementedException&amp;lt;/ID&amp;gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Exception instead of NotImplementedException</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#503460</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2005 08:35:29 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:503460</guid><dc:creator>AnsonH</dc:creator><description>Thanks Sean!  I've updated the post.</description></item><item><title>The daily link - Exception instead of NotImplementedException</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#539461</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:48:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:539461</guid><dc:creator>The daily link - Exception instead of NotImplementedException</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://daily.feature42.com/PermaLink,guid,364306bd-2146-4bbf-9d68-20b3e0add1bf.aspx"&gt;http://daily.feature42.com/PermaLink,guid,364306bd-2146-4bbf-9d68-20b3e0add1bf.aspx&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Rob Herbst   ::  The NotImplementedException</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#686089</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2006 08:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:686089</guid><dc:creator>Rob Herbst   ::  The NotImplementedException</dc:creator><description>PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.robherbst.com/blog/2006/07/30/the-notimplementedexception/"&gt;http://www.robherbst.com/blog/2006/07/30/the-notimplementedexception/&lt;/a&gt;</description></item><item><title>Generating NotImplementedException Instead Of Exception</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#875526</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 11:21:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:875526</guid><dc:creator>ploeh blog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Ever since I started using Visual Studio 2005, I've been enjoying its refactoring features, but it has&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item><item><title>re: Exception instead of NotImplementedException</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#1233719</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 21:26:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1233719</guid><dc:creator>Matthew Moody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Why do you need to change Literal/ID value to NotImplementedException if Literal/ID/Function value was already SimpleTypeName global::System.NotImplementedException)?&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Why not throw a NotImplementedException?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/ansonh/archive/2005/12/08/501763.aspx#1938831</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:28:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:1938831</guid><dc:creator>Craig Nicholson</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;In Andre 's recent post he asked why Visual Studio generates method stubs that throw a System.Exception&lt;/p&gt;
</description></item></channel></rss>