Welcome to MSDN Blogs Sign in | Join | Help

The MSDN Australia Blog

Blogging about everything good for software developers

News

We need more Aussie companies supporting Office Open XML

Hi Guys and gals,

We really need help from you all to make Ecma Office Open XML a standard and we need support from Australia. Would you be able to sign up to the community so that we have the support to get this through. All you need is list a company name, URL and one contact.

JOIN HERE

2007 marks a new era for Microsoft with the exciting launches of Windows Vista and Office 2007, and we look forward to partnering closely with you to realise the full potential of these products. This year is also an important year for Microsoft as Ecma Office Open XML, the document format for Office 2007, is currently being considered for ratification as an international standard for document formats before the International Organisation for Standardization (ISO).
Ratification of Ecma Office Open XML as an ISO standard is highly desirable for governments, IT users and IT industry players. It will create choice and enhance competition in the market place between document format standards, advance the ongoing technological development of document formats, and drive economic development around the world. The benefits of this document format:

· Highest quality standard that rigorously documents all aspects of the format

· Puts powerful extensibility in the hands of users, enabling new and innovative scenarios for creating and consuming data in documents

· Detailed specifications enables multiple interoperable implementations of individual features

· Enables compatibility with billions of existing documents

· Serves users needs in the areas of cultural diversity, accessibility and the long-term preservation of documents

· Puts control over the evolution of the standards in the hands of the largest user community (.i.e., the ISO)

On December 8th, Ecma International, a highly respected standardisation body, approved the adoption of Open XML as an international open standard. The technical committee that approved it represented a wide range of interests, including information technology companies (Apple, Intel, Novell, Microsoft, NextPage, Toshiba), government institutions that archive documents (the British Library, the U.S. Library of Congress) and sophisticated "power users" of information technology (BP, Statoil, Barclays Capital, Essilor).
We need your support to help us advocate ISO adoption of Ecma Office Open XML. There are a number of ways to do so:

1. Provide us with a 2-4 sentence statement of support for this document format that can be posted publicly.

2. Send a letter of support to be addressed to the local standards body. A suggested template for that letter of support is attached.

3. Register your support at http://www.openxmlcommunity.org/

If you have any questions on the document format or process for ISO Standardisation, please contact Sarah Bond, Platform Strategy Manager, Microsoft Australia at sarahbon@microsoft.com.

Thank you for your support. 

Fletch

Posted: Friday, June 15, 2007 3:34 PM by ausdev

Comments

David Tulloh said:

How is autoSpaceLikeWord95 an element of a "Highest quality standard that rigorously documents all aspects of the format".

The desired behaviour of autoSpaceLikeWord95 is not defined in the specification, rather it is recomended that it not be implemented. (as per lastest version of the "final" document, Part 4 2.15.3.6)

Doing this would result in incompatibilities with viewers of the same document, some viewers implementing this undocumented behaviour and some not.  Putting lie to benefits three and four in your list.

# June 18, 2007 1:17 AM

Bob Thompson said:

OOXML is not an unencumbered format and should not be supported as an ISO standard.

With vendor-specific tags, failure to support established standards and an unclear legal status for competitors who implement it, this is just another attempt to perpetuate the existing office format lockin.

Any attempt to endorse OOXML as a standard should be vigorously opposed, not supported.

# June 18, 2007 2:02 AM

M Garner said:

I completely agree with what Bob Thompson mentioned above OOXML is just another atempt at vendor lock-in and is not a open or unencumbered standard. It's just an attempt to undermine the OpenDocucment(ODF) format.

# June 18, 2007 2:18 AM

alspeirs said:

"an unclear legal status for competitors who implement it"

- Whereas JPEG is an ISO standard and its legal status is sooo much better.

On ODF, you have sun holding the patents and promising not to sue you. On OOXML you have MS holding the patents and promising not to sue you.

I'm sure there are differences in the legalese wording, but I'm a developer, thats not my problem. My problem is the billions of documents already out there and which format will be more backwards compatible.

ISO isn't mandating everyone to use a standard, it is just mandating a standard. The more standards the better IMHO.

# June 25, 2007 5:03 AM

L Deller said:

alspeirs: Why do you say "the more standards the better"?  Aren't interoperability standards about everyone speaking the same language?  Having multiple competing standards makes interoperability harder.

I do agree that it's great that Microsoft is (partially) documenting their new office file format.  It's important that Microsoft understands that its customers want interoperability rather than vendor lock-in.  I'm still a bit concerned that the campaign to make OOXML a standard is an attempt to protect vendor lock-in by maintaining control of office file formats.

Would it be such a bad thing if OOXML was knocked back by the ISO and Microsoft was consequentially persuaded to support ODF, contributing to the evolution of that standard where it is lacking?

# July 9, 2007 9:02 PM
New Comments to this post are disabled
Page view tracker