<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>.NETCF: The mini Y2K</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/abhinaba/archive/2010/01/01/netcf-the-mini-y2k.aspx</link><description>I am sure most people haven’t yet forgotten the Y2K problem . This year our team faced a mini Y2K, but don’t worry we anticipated it and all is well. If you head over to NETCF Wikipedia page you’d notice the NETCF versions look as follows &amp;lt;MajorVersion&amp;gt;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: .NETCF: The mini Y2K</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/abhinaba/archive/2010/01/01/netcf-the-mini-y2k.aspx#9962134</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:51:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9962134</guid><dc:creator>Prabir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;yymmdd is a better solution. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;i even tried tat long time back,but we are allowed to have only max of 5 digits as version numbers in .net&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9962134" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: .NETCF: The mini Y2K</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/abhinaba/archive/2010/01/01/netcf-the-mini-y2k.aspx#9943167</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:54:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9943167</guid><dc:creator>Abhinaba Basu [MSFT]</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Prabir a much better solution is to use yymmdd because that way you can sort the folder by name and it'll still sort by the version&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9943167" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: .NETCF: The mini Y2K</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/abhinaba/archive/2010/01/01/netcf-the-mini-y2k.aspx#9943165</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 19:28:36 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9943165</guid><dc:creator>Prabir</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I had figured out the same problem even before it happened. For my source code i use the following format:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major.1MinorYY.1MMDD.1HHMM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Its a bit tricky though.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example v1.10009.11226.11157, would be equivalent to&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Major: 1,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Minor: 100,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Year: 09,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Month: 12 (December),&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Day: 26th,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Hour: 11 (24hr clock),&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt; Minutes: 57&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Best way is to add 1 before starting anynew numbers. One bad thing about this is even the Minor already starts with 1.1 rather than 1.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;the Minor i put it for 3 digits so i can go to 1.3, 1.45 or stuffs like that which would be easier for consumers to understand.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9943165" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>