<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Warning: Shadow Copies for Shared Folders are not a replacement for backup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adioltean/archive/2005/02/05/367879.aspx</link><description>Shadow Copies for Shared Folders are a great feature that can give your users access to previous files in minutes, as opposed to hours or even days (as it is takes normally to reclaim a file from the tape in an corporate environment). 
 One word of caution</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>DR? It's in there</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adioltean/archive/2005/02/05/367879.aspx#447525</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 08:19:11 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:447525</guid><dc:creator>tonyso</dc:creator><description>Studies have shown that human error—primarily accidental file deletion or modification—causes over one-third...&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=447525" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Warning: Shadow Copies for Shared Folders are not a replacement for backup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adioltean/archive/2005/02/05/367879.aspx#367994</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 16:36:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:367994</guid><dc:creator>Adi Oltean</dc:creator><description>Even human error can have a disastruous effect when a data/file replication. If you delete a very important file, in many cases there is no easy to &amp;quot;cancel&amp;quot; the replication even after you realized your mistake!&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=367994" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Warning: Shadow Copies for Shared Folders are not a replacement for backup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adioltean/archive/2005/02/05/367879.aspx#367947</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2005 12:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:367947</guid><dc:creator>robert</dc:creator><description>There is an other reason to continue making the traditional back-ups: software errors can never be excluded.&lt;br&gt;This is true for any replication mecanism. I have seen many sites go down including the back-up site because a software error caused a data base corruption on the main site which immediately caused by replication the same error to be propagated to the back-up system. That's what called a rolling disaster.&lt;br&gt;In fact application software companies like SAP do not recommend synchronized replication, but slightly differed replication so that if a data corruption occurs on the main site you get a chance to check what happened before applying the data replication to the back-up system.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=367947" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>