http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adioltean/archive/2009/05/04/tom-s-hardware-ssd-comparison-table-take-2.aspxTom’s Hardware does it again! http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/256gb-samsung-ssd,2265-8.html What is notable is (again) the relative power consumption between various SSDs – ranging from 0.5W (for Intel X25-E/M) to a whopping 4.6 W (for Soliddata)en-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adioltean/archive/2009/05/04/tom-s-hardware-ssd-comparison-table-take-2.aspx#9587020Tue, 05 May 2009 02:37:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9587020Tom???s Hardware: SSD comparison table (take 2) | ASP NET Hosting<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://asp-net-hosting.simplynetdev.com/tom%e2%80%99s-hardware-ssd-comparison-table-take-2/">http://asp-net-hosting.simplynetdev.com/tom%e2%80%99s-hardware-ssd-comparison-table-take-2/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9587020" width="1" height="1">