http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspxWith the release of Visual Studio 2008 and the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1, there are some bug fixes and improvements in ADO.NET (A list of the general fixes is at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/945757 ) We worked with the CLR team to get improvementsen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7524823Thu, 07 Feb 2008 23:05:36 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7524823Hot Topics<p>Two great posts appeared recently on the ADO.NET team blog. The first details some of the performance</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7524823" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7477521Wed, 06 Feb 2008 01:45:20 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7477521OPC Diary<p>SP1においてスレッドプール周りの見直し等によりパフォーマンスが改善されたという...</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7477521" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7442634Mon, 04 Feb 2008 20:47:16 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7442634Bruno Guardia (MSFT)<p>The improvements come part from each component: the .NET CLR, core ADO.Net and SqlClient. While I cannot talk for a specific proprietary data provider, probably you will get at least part of the benefits in similar scenarios.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7442634" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7422729Mon, 04 Feb 2008 05:04:43 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7422729Simon Brangwin<p>Are these performance improvements to the ADO.NET core or just the SqlClient ADO.NET provider? In other words, will our proprietary ADO.NET data provider benefit from SP1?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7422729" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7384559Sat, 02 Feb 2008 10:51:37 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7384559DotNetKicks.com<p>You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7384559" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7351085Thu, 31 Jan 2008 17:07:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7351085Sam Gentile<p>I was going to write a separate post on this but I will include it here. I have had the opportunity to</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7351085" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7326686Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:46:21 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7326686Mik<p>Great!</p> <p>But you guys could at least categorize this bug-fixing list. It is so uncool to read all these bug fixes...</p> <p>Anyway, many thanks for the job you do :)</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7326686" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7319999Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:24:47 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7319999Jon Shern<p>Ping back from </p> <p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://jonshern.com/2008/01/29/adonet-performance-improvements-with-net-framework-20-sp1/">http://jonshern.com/2008/01/29/adonet-performance-improvements-with-net-framework-20-sp1/</a></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7319999" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7311615Tue, 29 Jan 2008 22:36:24 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7311615Christopher G. Lewis<p>Any idea if these ADO.Net fixes would help SharePoint &nbsp;(MOSS/WSS) installations?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7311615" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/adonet/archive/2008/01/28/ado-net-performance-improvements-with-the-net-framework-2-0-sp1.aspx#7308171Tue, 29 Jan 2008 19:43:58 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7308171Jonathan Bruce<p>Are these threading improvements just back ported from the 3.5 Framework code-base?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7308171" width="1" height="1">