<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>To R2 Or Not To R2?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alexhomer/archive/2009/11/29/to-r2-or-not-to-r2_3F00_.aspx</link><description>...that is the question. Whether 'tis nobler in the server cabinet to suffer the outrageous lack of valuable new functionality, or to take arms against the powerful improvements to the core Windows Server operating system. And by opposing, manage without</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: To R2 Or Not To R2?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alexhomer/archive/2009/11/29/to-r2-or-not-to-r2_3F00_.aspx#10226857</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 06:03:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10226857</guid><dc:creator>deng</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Or maybe a couple of bruisers from the Windows Server division will pop round with baseball bats to persuade me to upgrade...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10226857" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>