<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Exceptions, Data Validation and Political Correctness</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alfredth/archive/2009/05/27/exceptions-data-validation-and-political-correctness.aspx</link><description>When I first heard the term “exception handling” as a replacement for “error handling” I was not impressed. At first glance it seemed like political correctness gone wild and brought into computer science. I’d been calling it error handling for a long</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Exceptions, Data Validation and Political Correctness</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alfredth/archive/2009/05/27/exceptions-data-validation-and-political-correctness.aspx#9644982</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 00:17:49 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9644982</guid><dc:creator>Avi Burstein</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for bringing this up. As a self-taught programmer coming from the VB6 era, I never understood why there was so much emphasis put on structured-exception handling. Like you said, if I can expect it, then I can anticipate it and prevent it! In the end, I found uses for it, but I often think it is one of those things that are used more often than neccessary simply because it's supposedly the 'right way' to code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9644982" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>