<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx</link><description>asp.netPRO magazine is the only ASP.NET magazine on the market (AFAIK). I wrote an article (and a handful of tips) for the magazine last year and have been reading the magazine since its first issue. 
 I'm trying to decide where I would like to focus</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title> Alex Lowe s NET Blog Do you read asp netPRO magazine | Wood TV Stand</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#9672310</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 02:06:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9672310</guid><dc:creator> Alex Lowe s NET Blog Do you read asp netPRO magazine | Wood TV Stand</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://woodtvstand.info/story.php?id=12483"&gt;http://woodtvstand.info/story.php?id=12483&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9672310" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15518</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2003 03:48:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15518</guid><dc:creator>Samer Ibrahim</dc:creator><description>Ditto to the low quality comments.  I think there is too much excellent free content to justify paying for a magazine that provides sub-par articles.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15518" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15375</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 16:02:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15375</guid><dc:creator>Sam Gentile</dc:creator><description>Agreed with Scott and everyone. I find the articles way too basic. &lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15375" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15370</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 15:27:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15370</guid><dc:creator>Michael Dorfman</dc:creator><description>Same here.  I've been subscribing since the Premiere issue, but generally find the articles to be far too basic.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15370" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15368</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 14:28:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15368</guid><dc:creator>Ron Green</dc:creator><description>Not to sound repetitive, but I alos agree with Scott. It seems like the last few issues have been pretty thin on content especially advanced content.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15368" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15362</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 09:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15362</guid><dc:creator>Paschal</dc:creator><description>Agree with Scott. The last edition I just finished to read spent too much time on listing third-parties solutions than real articles.
&lt;br&gt;
A good magazine is Code, because it have a range between newbies and expert level articles.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15362" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15349</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 03:04:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15349</guid><dc:creator>Jeff Julian</dc:creator><description>I agree with Scott.  A magazine must have a &amp;quot;Black-belt&amp;quot; section to it.  I do think the magazine does well with our audience though.  Magazines like &amp;quot;.Net&amp;quot; and others are targeted for managers, where MSDN, VSMag, JavaPro, and ASP.NET are made for the people who actually use the technologies.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15349" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Do you read asp.netPRO magazine?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/alowe/archive/2003/05/25/7561.aspx#15348</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2003 02:57:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:15348</guid><dc:creator>Scott Watermasysk</dc:creator><description>IMO, the content &amp;quot;level&amp;quot; has been pretty low recently. I would like to see a better mix of newbie to professinal articles. 
&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
I understand everyone has to start somewhere...but if they want readers to renew subscriptions they will have to start publishing more advanced articles.
&lt;br&gt;

&lt;br&gt;
-Scott&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=15348" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>