<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Read only, frozen, and immutable collections</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/andrewarnottms/archive/2011/08/22/read-only-frozen-and-immutable-types-and-collections.aspx</link><description>[Update: a more recent post with new data on attainable performance of immutable collections ] 
 The topics of immutability and functional programming has fascinated me lately. Mostly because of my work on the Visual Studio Common Project System (CPS</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Read only, frozen, and immutable collections</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/andrewarnottms/archive/2011/08/22/read-only-frozen-and-immutable-types-and-collections.aspx#10359215</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 18:26:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10359215</guid><dc:creator>Andrew L Arnott</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, thanks for the typo notice. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;ve corrected it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10359215" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Read only, frozen, and immutable collections</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/andrewarnottms/archive/2011/08/22/read-only-frozen-and-immutable-types-and-collections.aspx#10321304</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:11:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10321304</guid><dc:creator>Exit Music</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Under the performance section, you say &amp;quot;Before you write off mutable collections&amp;quot;, when I think you mean &amp;quot;Before you write off immutable collections&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Am I write (I&amp;#39;m funny aren&amp;#39;t I?) in thinking this? I&amp;#39;m not too clued up on this subject, and this part was a source of confusion for me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10321304" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Read only, frozen, and immutable collections</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/andrewarnottms/archive/2011/08/22/read-only-frozen-and-immutable-types-and-collections.aspx#10200453</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 17:33:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10200453</guid><dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The data storage topic grabbed my attention; it may be interesting to evaluate benefits of special, uncommon data structures in context-specific applications.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10200453" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>