<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Some behind-the-scenes details about .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 setup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx</link><description>Since the .NET Framework 3.5 shipped, I've written a few blog posts about some of the setup and deployment issues that can affect this product. Behind the scenes, the installer for the .NET Framework 3.5 has some architectural differences from previous</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Links to more detailed information about the .NET Framework 3.5 client profile</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#8565151</link><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 04:26:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8565151</guid><dc:creator>Aaron Stebner's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;The beta version of the .NET Framework 3.5 SP1 and Visual Studio 2008 SP1 were released a few weeks ago.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8565151" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some behind-the-scenes details about .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 setup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7909184</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:23:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7909184</guid><dc:creator>Aaron Stebner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi theUtmost - The netfx20sp1_x86.exe package can be installed in silent mode by running netfx20sp1_x86.exe /q /norestart. &amp;nbsp;Please note that this package will not allow you to install on Windows Vista (because the .NET Framework 2.0 is an OS component, and the service pack has to be installed by the OS servicing system and not by this MSI package).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The only supported option to run the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 in minimal UI mode with just a progress bar is to create an administrative install point and deploy the MSI directly with the /qb or /qb! switch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hopefully this helps! &amp;nbsp;If you run into issues, the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 setup creates log files named %temp%\dd_net_framework*.txt that can be helpful for debugging.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7909184" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>.NET Framework 2.0 SP1 silent install switches</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7897961</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 05:04:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7897961</guid><dc:creator>theUtmost</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;1stup, thanks for the very helpful blogs - I've checked out a few, including the admin install point one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Secondly, sorry for what is probably a foolish query here, but I really have searched high and low, tried many things, but cannot perform what I'm after: a silent install of .Net Framework 2.0 SP1, using the native &amp;quot;NetFx20SP1_x86.exe&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I can happily install .Net Framework 2.0 using:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dotnetfx.exe /Q:U /C:&amp;quot; install.exe /q&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And I have read that for .Net Framework 3.0 this works:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dotnetfx3.exe /q /norestart&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;or apparently even the older style switches:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dotnetfx3.exe /qb!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But, it seems that no matter what switches I use for NetFx20SP1_x86.exe, it ALWAYS pops up the EULA page.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I'd love to know how to install NetFx20SP1_x86.exe silently, and accept the EULA, ideally with &amp;quot;minimal UI&amp;quot; ie just a progress bar, rather than fully silent install.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Admin Install Point method is of no use to me, because all the machines I need to install .Net 2.0 SP1 onto are only available over a slow WAN link, yet they have fast local internet connections BUT autoupdate disabled for other reasons. Should also point out this is a non-domain, non-AD environment.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what I'm aiming at is to be able to remote control each PC, download &amp;quot;NetFx20SP1_x86.exe&amp;quot; from MS to each local machine, then run a simple batch file to install .Net 2.0 SP1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Any ideas gratefully received!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7897961" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; How to perform a silent repair and uninstall of the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7807553</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 04:39:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7807553</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » How to perform a silent repair and uninstall of the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/02/19/how-to-perform-a-silent-repair-and-uninstall-of-the-net-framework-20-sp1-and-30-sp1/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/02/19/how-to-perform-a-silent-repair-and-uninstall-of-the-net-framework-20-sp1-and-30-sp1/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7807553" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to perform a silent repair and uninstall of the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7805903</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 03:07:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7805903</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 shipped (as prerequisites for the .NET Framework 3.5 and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7805903" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>How to perform a silent repair and uninstall of the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7805445</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 02:38:55 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7805445</guid><dc:creator>Aaron Stebner's WebLog</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Since the .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 shipped (as prerequisites for the .NET Framework 3.5 and&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7805445" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Some behind-the-scenes details about .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 setup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7225816</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2008 22:19:42 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7225816</guid><dc:creator>TerryCheng</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Aaron, this is great posting. &amp;nbsp;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7225816" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Good, Bad or just Different?</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7192609</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:26:44 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7192609</guid><dc:creator>Christopher Painter</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blog.deploymentengineering.com/2008/01/good-bad-or-just-different.html"&gt;http://blog.deploymentengineering.com/2008/01/good-bad-or-just-different.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7192609" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Interesting Finds: January 18, 2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7149787</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 18:11:46 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7149787</guid><dc:creator>Jason Haley</dc:creator><description>&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7149787" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Some behind-the-scenes details about .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 setup</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/astebner/archive/2008/01/17/7145670.aspx#7146461</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 08:57:32 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7146461</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Some behind-the-scenes details about .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and 3.0 SP1 setup</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/01/18/some-behind-the-scenes-details-about-net-framework-20-sp1-and-30-sp1-setup/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/01/18/some-behind-the-scenes-details-about-net-framework-20-sp1-and-30-sp1-setup/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7146461" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>