I wanted to explore some scenarios that illustrate a few important concepts related to inventory costing-- look at differences between physical and financial inventory, and how this affects inventory values. Please reply to the post if you have questions or comments, or if you are interested in additional posts on this topic. This is not intended to be a comprehensive look at AX inventory costing, but just a few concepts that I view as important to understanding the big picture of AX costing logic.
For my test, I created a new item, using a FIFO costing model. The Inventory model group has three settings I want to point out and illustrate:
Note that the test item has physical and financial negative inventory unmarked, and 'include physical value' is marked:
To start, I create a purchase order line for the item and post the packing slip for a quantity of 10 at $1 each. The PO packing slip is considered a 'physical' inventory update. You'll see the inventory transaction and the item's on hand reflect the physical cost amount:
This is an important concept as you'll see the separation of physical and financial inventory throughout AX. Understanding the impact is important when defining your setup and processes. Below is a list of the transactions that result in physical inventory value and those that result in financial inventory value.
Transactions that affect physical value
Purchase order Packing Slip
Sales order Packing Slip
Production order Report as Finished
Production picking list journal
Transactions that affect financial value
Purchase order Invoice
Sales order Invoice
Production order End (This will move the RAF and the Picking List transactions into a financial status)
Inventory Journal (All inventory journals affect financial value only)
Next, I entered a sales order line for the item, quantity 10, and attempt to post the invoice. Although I have physically received 10 units of this item into stock, my sales invoice posting fails with an error message: "Item consumption for 10.00 cannot be updated because the cost price is known only for 0.00 in stock."
The error is thrown because of the model group setting 'negative financial inventory', which is unmarked for our item, meaning that we don't allow negative Financial inventory. If the sales order was for a quantity of 15, I would receive an error message: "15.00 cannot be picked because only 10.00 is/are available from the inventory"
This error message is driven by the 'Physical negative inventory' checkbox, which does a validation against the current 'total available' on hand inventory for the item. In order to post this invoice, we need to have sufficient financial inventory in stock. To satisfy this requirement, you would have to financially update an outstanding order, or create and post a new order. For our test, I created a separate purchase order for quantity of 10, unit cost $2, and post the Invoice for this purchase order (financially updated). Note that this is a different unit cost, than was used on the previous purchase order($1).
Reviewing the inventory transaction for this new purchase order, you see that a financial cost amount was updated. Additionally, the on-hand for the item now reflects the $10 from the packing slip updated purchase order, as well as the $20 from the invoiced purchase order.
Now that I have sufficient financial inventory, I posted my sales order invoice. There are two important concepts to point out on the sales order inventory transaction after I post the invoice. First, you'll see that the cost of the quantities sold is an average of the two receipts that have been posted: (10@ $1 + 10@ $2) / 20 = $1.50 per unit. Take a look at the previous screenshot and you'll see that in the On Hand form, the 'Cost price' field holds the calculated average cost. Although we defined this item as a FIFO item, the value of the outbound quantities are valued at the current running average for the item. You'll see this approach used for all issue transactions, except for items using a standard cost valuation model.
*Note - Marking may also impact these outcomes.
The second thing is that our model group setting for 'include physical value' has made an impact on the outcome. Since we have it marked for this item, the physically updated purchase order was used in the calculation of the running average. The setting simply tells AX whether or not to use physically updated receipts when calculating the running average for the item. If we had this setting unmarked, only the financially updated receipt would have been used in the calculated value of the issued quantities. We now know that this will have a significant impact on the valuation of outbound quantities at the time of posting.
Since this is a FIFO item, we know that the $15 used to value our sold quantities is incorrect. AX requires that a periodic 'inventory close' be processed in order to align the cost of goods sold with the items' assigned valuation models. After running the close, notice that the sales order transaction now reflects a cost amount $10 with the adjustment of $5. Another thing to point out is that no 'settlement' occurs. Typically, the inventory close process will settle receipts against issues. However, since this sales transaction aligns with a physically updated receipt, no settlement occurs. Once the purchase order is invoiced, the close process will settle the transactions against each other.
More about the 'include physical value' setting:
This should only be used for certain scenarios. Weighted average models should not use the setting due to the following scenario:
1. Receive 10 @ $100 each (Financial/Invoice posted)
2. Receive 10 @ $200 each (Physical/packing slip post)
3. Issue 15 @ $150 each (Financial/invoice post). $150 each is due to the fact that 'include physical' is marked for the item. Also, this transaction requires that negative financial inventory is allowed for the item.
4. Run inventory close
10 of the 15 issue quantities are settled against the $100 receipt and the other 5 remain unsettled at the $150 cost price. This leaves us with 5 on hand, valued at $250 each (which is higher than any single receipt cost we have)
Would it be possible for you to do a costing model example like this for all of the costing types so people could compare and determine the best methods to use for their site. I would really like to see an example like this using the Standard Costing.
Hi Graham - I posted something on Standard costing today.
Hi Graham, Could you please post more topics about inventory close? for example , how to the explain the settlements after inventory close?
This page is intended to provide you with the resources available for Inventory Costing in Microsoft
Thank you for this post, it is very informative.
I have a scenario where I am using Weighted avg. date inventory model and I do not have the Include physical value check box selected. However, I am stil running into the last point you made regarding your qty and cost price do not match up when viewing my inventory by different dimensions. This seems to be occuring because my dimension groups are set up to track physical inventory by warehouse and batch, but to track financial inventory by warehouse only.
Do you have any comments on this scenario in general? Is there a way to re-allocate costs at the physical level to prevent or fix this situation?
Great post. Crystal clear and hope that more will follow.