http://blogs.msdn.com/askburton

Back from the road again… The Security Roadshow for Developers was a true success. For many attendees it was the start of a long journey… All the slides and demos can be found here

The number one problem in dealing with rpc-literal Web Services is the fact that they are unsupported on the .NET platform, yet. However, every rpc-literal message can be “built” using a doc-literal based implementations. By doing so, the .NET stub for...

Given the following WSDL, how does your .NET proxy and stub look like? As always, answer and explanation will follow… Note, it’s rpc-literal … <? xml version ="1.0" encoding ="utf-8"?> < wsdl:definitions targetNamespace...

The answer to Issue 7 is the following: < wsdl:binding name ="CalculatorSoap" type ="tns:CalculatorPortType"> < soap:binding style ="rpc" transport ="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/http"/> < wsdl:operation name ="Add"> ...

The recorded MSDN CodeDOM Webcast can be found here .

The following Issue arose out of several enquires. Here is the consolidated question: How does the corresponding SOAP binding look like if you want to get a WS-I compliant WSDL? As always, answer and explanation will follow… <? xml...

The demos are now available for download!