<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx</link><description>The Team Foundation Server 11 Developer Preview introduces a number of simplifications and enhancements in Lab Management.&amp;#160; The primary one you will notice in the developer preview is the introduction of 'Standard environments'.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10406435</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2013 01:56:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10406435</guid><dc:creator>Brian Harry MS</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;@Ted, yes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brian&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10406435" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10406150</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:51:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10406150</guid><dc:creator>Ted Williams</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Does TFS 2012 lab management support clustered Hyper-V hosts with SCVMM 2012 and VMM2012 SP1? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10406150" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10386407</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2013 22:06:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10386407</guid><dc:creator>TD</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it difficult to support snapshots with VMWare or is it a strategic decision to push HyperV?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If it is the former, then why is it difficult? If it is a matter of taking snapshots and being able to go back to a snapshot, then VMWare supports it anyway doesn&amp;#39;t it? In which case isn&amp;#39;t it a case of hooking into the right points in some form of a Lab Management API to execute the equivalent for VMWare or any virtualisation platform for that matter?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10386407" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10291087</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Apr 2012 13:04:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10291087</guid><dc:creator>Anu</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nick - you can have a single standard environment that wraps both physical machines and virtual machines into the same environment. Hope that helps&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10291087" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10275066</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 00:18:34 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10275066</guid><dc:creator>Nick Gamroth</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Is it going to be possible to have both VMs and physical machines in a single test environment?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10275066" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10257562</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:20:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10257562</guid><dc:creator>Brian Harry MS</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, we&amp;#39;ve enabled that in TFS 11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bran&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10257562" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10257561</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 13:14:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10257561</guid><dc:creator>Matt Keen</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are there are plans to allow Lab management to create environments on clustered hosts through SCVMM? This would be a really useful feature!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10257561" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10249189</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 14:42:41 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10249189</guid><dc:creator>Philip Coupar</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Are there any plans to include Azure environments under lab manager. &amp;nbsp;I would like to deploy my application to one or more Azure subscriptions run my test scripts and then teardown the environments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another useful feature would be to identify a subscription to populate with load test agents able to run codedUI tests and pre-installed with various browsers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10249189" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10244725</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:09:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10244725</guid><dc:creator>Matthew Mitrik (MS)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Robert, can you contact me directly? &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;d like to understand your scenario more in depth. &amp;nbsp;My email address is mmitrik at microsoft dot com&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10244725" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Lab Management improvements in TFS 11</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2011/10/31/lab-management-improvements-in-tfs-11.aspx#10243829</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2011 21:15:43 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10243829</guid><dc:creator>Robert Beaubien</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Matt, the problem with your suggestion is that when we delete the old team project the history of the moved team project is also lost, there&amp;#39;s no + to follow the history back to the original team project because the orginal team project is deleted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What we want is a way to MOVE (yes actually MOVE) the history and all of the metadata(I&amp;#39;m looking at annotions) to a new team project and then remove/delete/destroy the old team project and still retain the history and all of the metadata from the original team project in the new team project. Does this make sense? &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It&amp;#39;s also very troubling and doesn&amp;#39;t instill confidence in the slightest that the history is available to be seen on folders...but not on the actual items themselves. That seems like a really weak implementation/design.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10243829" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>