<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>WPF Performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2010/04/18/wpf-performance.aspx</link><description>A few months ago I was writing a great deal about the performance issues that were uncovered in Beta 2 and our efforts to address them.&amp;#160; As a result of your feedback and help the product we have now released is TREMENDOUSLY better.&amp;#160; Thank you</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: WPF Performance</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharry/archive/2010/04/18/wpf-performance.aspx#9998076</link><pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:13:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9998076</guid><dc:creator>Maximilian Haru Raditya</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Moving VS to be a heavy WPF user certainly put a lot of strain on WPF and was really a great way to help mature WPF quickly.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I like this sentence, especially the last part :). The WPF vNext should benefit from this also, I guess.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9998076" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>