http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/04/08/49934.aspxMore from inside the walls: Q: Does anyone know why we’ve created two ways to sign the components? The certificate form covers all the needs I can see. I wonder why we have a separate “strong naming” manner to do signing that doesn’t cover all theen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/04/08/49934.aspx#9706353Mon, 08 Jun 2009 05:09:12 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9706353 Brad Abrams Why Strong Naming | Green Tea Fat Burner<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://greenteafatburner.info/story.php?id=1728">http://greenteafatburner.info/story.php?id=1728</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9706353" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/04/08/49934.aspx#9670145Sun, 31 May 2009 18:45:57 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9670145 Brad Abrams Why Strong Naming | Outdoor Ceiling Fans<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://outdoorceilingfansite.info/story.php?id=5946">http://outdoorceilingfansite.info/story.php?id=5946</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9670145" width="1" height="1">