<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Being Smart about FxCop</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/06/26/50076.aspx</link><description>I love FxCop…. If you have not seen 
it you should totally go check it 
out … Like all great developer tools it started its life because a developer 
had a focused problem he needed to solve. 
 One of the lead developers on the then newly formed 
. NET</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>RE: Being Smart about FxCop</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/06/26/50076.aspx#50079</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:50079</guid><dc:creator>Brad Abrams</dc:creator><description>Sorry about the bad link, I fixed it...

OK, ok not a great example... let me think on it more.



&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50079" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Being Smart about FxCop</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/06/26/50076.aspx#50078</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:12:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:50078</guid><dc:creator>theCoach</dc:creator><description>hmmm...in your example, I might prefer that the semantics of 'Get' be used for properties, whereas a method call like GenerateNext() might be a better name. I am sure that there are good examples of what you are talking about, but IMHO, in this case you can come up with a better name.
I have not yet downloaded this version, but I have always imagined that a tool like this should be hooked up to the Word dictionary, check for proper-casing and then make a Word bag of all of the terms that are used - generating possible synonyms and some common best practice mappings to some words. The word bag could also be generated form a client write ups, and give hints in creating new type names. Just a thought.&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50078" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>RE: Being Smart about FxCop</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brada/archive/2003/06/26/50076.aspx#50077</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2003 12:07:00 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:50077</guid><dc:creator>Yosi Taguri</dc:creator><description>hi,
the last link to the slides is not working , could you fix it?&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=50077" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>