http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspxThis is the fifth post by Zeyad Rajabi who owns the XHTML output from Word's new blogging feature . In earlier posts, Zeyad discussed a general overview of the XHTML , details on XHML compliance , how we map styles to semantics , and bullets and numberingen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspx#9783984Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:32:39 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9783984 Brian Jones Office Extensibility Word XHTML Tables | adirondack chairs<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://adirondackchairshub.info/story.php?id=3790">http://adirondackchairshub.info/story.php?id=3790</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9783984" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspx#9771624Thu, 18 Jun 2009 05:05:24 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9771624 Brian Jones Office Extensibility Word XHTML Tables | patio set<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://patiosetsite.info/story.php?id=997">http://patiosetsite.info/story.php?id=997</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9771624" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspx#756757Sat, 16 Sep 2006 02:59:08 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:756757The Microsoft Office Word Team's BlogWelcome to the Microsoft Office Word Team's blog; you source for all things Word related. I'm Jonathan...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=756757" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspx#701584Tue, 15 Aug 2006 23:52:34 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:701584Zeyad RajabiChrisb I am really glad you brought that comment up. I do agree that our HTML output for tables is quite verbose and perhaps redundant. The redundancy is mainly due to the fact that we cannot output re-usable CSS definitions because our XHTML output is in regards to posting blogs. We can only send the body of the XHTML to the blogging sites. Anything else will get stripped on the receiving end. That is the reason all CSS is inline. <br> <br>Zeyad Rajabi (MS)<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=701584" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspx#701046Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:20:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:701046chrisbI hope you're gonna be trimming down the embedded styles in release version - thats a huge amount of redundant code you're putting inline.. &nbsp;not working with intranets anymore ;)<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=701046" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brian_jones/archive/2006/08/14/700510.aspx#700807Tue, 15 Aug 2006 10:56:10 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:700807hAlHow does the blogging feature in MS Office 2007 compare to the new Windows Live Writer beta that has just been released also by Microsoft ? <br>Wouldn't it have been simpeler to add the Windows live writer to Office 2007 as a separate usefull tool ?<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=700807" width="1" height="1">