http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brismith/archive/2011/10/28/project-2003-service-pack-3-sp3-and-the-october-2011-cumulative-update-cu.aspx*** Update - thanks to all who corrected me on the title - don't know how many times I must have read that and not noticed - yes, this is for 2007 and not 2003... *** I&rsquo;ve posted over on the admin blog - http://blogs.technet.com/b/projectadministrationen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brismith/archive/2011/10/28/project-2003-service-pack-3-sp3-and-the-october-2011-cumulative-update-cu.aspx#10231653Mon, 31 Oct 2011 13:36:42 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10231653Brian Smith - MSFT<p>Thnaks David and Christoph - yes I did mean 2007 - sorry for any confusion.</p> <p>Brian.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10231653" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brismith/archive/2011/10/28/project-2003-service-pack-3-sp3-and-the-october-2011-cumulative-update-cu.aspx#10231544Mon, 31 Oct 2011 07:45:42 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10231544Christoph Muelder<p>Hi Brian,</p> <p>I think you mean &quot;Project 2007&quot; :-)</p> <p>I just wondered for two seconds, if you have started over with creating fixes for 2003 :-)</p> <p>Christoph</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10231544" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/brismith/archive/2011/10/28/project-2003-service-pack-3-sp3-and-the-october-2011-cumulative-update-cu.aspx#10231527Mon, 31 Oct 2011 05:53:19 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10231527David<p>should the title of the blog post say 2007 instead of 2003?</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10231527" width="1" height="1">