<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx</link><description>Recently two more large databases were attacked and compromised, one at the popular Gawker Media sites and the other at McDonald&amp;rsquo;s. Every time this kind of thing happens (which is FAR too often) it should remind the technical professional to ensure</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10144226</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:36:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10144226</guid><dc:creator>ABob</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I would disagree about MS office encryption. It was trivial in previous versions but since 2007 they have implemented AES which &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;makes brute forece search much harder. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is one more thing I wanted to point here.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately security and usability are somewhat fighting each other.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I mean the more security you impose the harder it is to use the system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Talking about strong passwords.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Imagine you are using some really strong password like random letters as &amp;quot;k43,9a§%$Zha&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;What are the chances that you will eventually forget it after a good vacation? I bet the chances are big.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means a system designer must put measures to allow users to restore their passwords, recover them or allow generating new.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These special tools are also have to be implemented with highest details, one single mistake could break the entire system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I was astonished once when I read about guys at &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://passwordnow.com"&gt;http://passwordnow.com&lt;/a&gt;, which use clusters to run brute force search for users which&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;want to recover their data. It is really amasing how many poor people face the issue of getting their forgotten password.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My final advise is that users should think about forgetting their password and make a hard copy somewhere in the safe place.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10144226" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10105925</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:36:48 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10105925</guid><dc:creator>Speedbird186</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;From a risk perspective, it might actually make sense to have a few different root passwords. Perhaps one root for banking sites, another for e-commerce sites and a third for online comments only. That way, the number of variations for each root is reduced, making it easier to remember.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The third root might as well not have any variations. Doesn&amp;#39;t really matter if my commentx.com account gets hacked if the only place it&amp;#39;ll work is on commenty.com -- provided the implications of hackers having access to both sites carries the same weight (as in, someone could post a comment on my behalf, but not shop or see credit card history, etc.)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10105925" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10105443</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:31:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10105443</guid><dc:creator>Rowlandg</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Password Safe is the only way I&amp;#39;ve found to keep my various worlds safe. Nice topic Buck.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10105443" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10105431</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:57:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10105431</guid><dc:creator>Ronald Dameron (@RonDBA)</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;So far I&amp;#39;ve survived by having a root password that is not a dictionary word, uses mixed case, numerics and special characters that I will never forget. Then, I tack on a mnemonic suffix for the different sites that I use that require a password. &amp;nbsp;I&amp;#39;m very near the point of migrating to something like Password Safe because I find that I sometimes forget the suffix for a particular site if I don&amp;#39;t visit enough. I second Password Safe as a recommendation. &amp;nbsp;Used it at my last employer to store important passwords securely.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10105431" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10104862</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:54:09 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10104862</guid><dc:creator>Kirchner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, that was fast :)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;ll give Password Safe a try. Thanks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10104862" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10104853</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:46:54 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10104853</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Kirchner - I wouldn&amp;#39;t trust it, personally. Not for enterprise level stuff. It has a use-case, but not for my password safe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10104853" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Online Password Security Tactics</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2010/12/14/online-password-security-tactics.aspx#10104851</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:44:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10104851</guid><dc:creator>Kirchner</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Hum, what about Office OneNote password protection? MS says it&amp;#39;s based on a strong encryption algorithm...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10104851" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>