<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>The Very Big and the very small</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2008/01/03/the-very-big-and-the-very-small.aspx</link><description>We’ve been seeing a renewed interest in two different areas in databases – embedded databases and large-scale enterprise systems. Sure, the core database audience remains in the department-level and higher sized machines, but as developers are working</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: The Very Big and the very small</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2008/01/03/the-very-big-and-the-very-small.aspx#6972967</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jan 2008 02:24:50 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6972967</guid><dc:creator>BuckWoody</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;I was sent this question, so I answered as you can see below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I liked today's post and it brought up a question. &amp;nbsp;What is the largest database you have seen or heard of in the SQL Server 2005 product line? &amp;nbsp;My current client is working with a 10-15TB size and I'm sure that is not the largest going. &amp;nbsp;It would be nice to have some numbers to provide them to ease their concern. &amp;nbsp;Anything you could add would be great.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;W&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--------------------------&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Well, I've seen 64 TB as a large database, but I'm sure the marketing folks and the CATT team know of bigger than that. It also depends on what you mean by &amp;quot;large&amp;quot;, since that can include DB size, transactions per second, uptime, number of processors or servers and so on. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Great question though - and this might help:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/compare/wintercorp-survey.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/compare/wintercorp-survey.mspx&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/casestudies/default.mspx"&gt;http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/casestudies/default.mspx&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6972967" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Very Big and the very small</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2008/01/03/the-very-big-and-the-very-small.aspx#6970393</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:16:12 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6970393</guid><dc:creator>Noticias externas</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We’ve been seeing a renewed interest in two different areas in databases – embedded databases and large&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6970393" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>