<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>Why you should upgrade to SQL Server 2008</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2008/05/06/why-you-should-upgrade-to-sql-server-2008.aspx</link><description>One of the readers recently asked about the blog post I made regarding the performance of replication being so improved in SQL Server 2008. We don’t have a formal study posted on that particular result yet, but we do have others that talk about speed</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title> Carpe Datum Why you should upgrade to SQL Server 2008 | Insomnia Cure</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/buckwoody/archive/2008/05/06/why-you-should-upgrade-to-sql-server-2008.aspx#9719944</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 03:59:15 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9719944</guid><dc:creator> Carpe Datum Why you should upgrade to SQL Server 2008 | Insomnia Cure</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://insomniacuresite.info/story.php?id=7226"&gt;http://insomniacuresite.info/story.php?id=7226&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9719944" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>