<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"><channel><title>The New Pricing Model for SQL Azure Explained!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cbiyikoglu/archive/2012/02/16/the-new-pricing-model-for-sql-azure-explained.aspx</link><description>The new pricing model is an amazing improvement over the original model. In 60 seconds here are the 2 major improvements you will notice: 
 #1 - New 100MB Option: Smaller databases has been a big ask. If you do not have a multi-tenant database tier,</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: The New Pricing Model for SQL Azure Explained!</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cbiyikoglu/archive/2012/02/16/the-new-pricing-model-for-sql-azure-explained.aspx#10268946</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:06:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10268946</guid><dc:creator>Dimitri C</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice, it looks like the new model prevents an almost exponential cost-raise in resources. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10268946" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>