http://blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/09/26/choosing-not-to-use-anonymous-types-in-query-expressions.aspxThis introductory level post covers a new LINQ feature in C# 3.0 called anonymous types. I'll focus on explaining when you might want to use an anonymous type, and when it might be more useful to use a specific type instead of an anonymous type. UsingenTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/09/26/choosing-not-to-use-anonymous-types-in-query-expressions.aspx#5205551Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:12:18 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5205551Charlie Calvert's Community Blog<p>Welcome to the thirty second issue of Community Convergence. I write these posts to keep you up to date</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5205551" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/09/26/choosing-not-to-use-anonymous-types-in-query-expressions.aspx#5174095Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:44:04 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5174095Daniel Newell<p>Beautiful!!! &nbsp;Great and simple explanation of using anonymous types and the new C#3 syntax! &nbsp;</p> <p>Thanks for the post!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5174095" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/charlie/archive/2007/09/26/choosing-not-to-use-anonymous-types-in-query-expressions.aspx#5170921Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:06:13 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:5170921DotNetKicks.com<p>You've been kicked (a good thing) - Trackback from DotNetKicks.com</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=5170921" width="1" height="1">