<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Physical storage and physical topology recommendations</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrisfie/archive/2008/03/22/physical-storage-and-physical-topology-recommendations.aspx</link><description>Two very useful SharePoint Server articles have been published on TechNet that are directly applicable to a Project Server farm. As I mentioned yesterday a properly configured SQL server will help Improving Queue Performance . Physical storage recommendations</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>MSDN Blog Postings  &amp;raquo; Physical storage and physical topology recommendations</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/chrisfie/archive/2008/03/22/physical-storage-and-physical-topology-recommendations.aspx#8330374</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 04:50:22 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8330374</guid><dc:creator>MSDN Blog Postings  » Physical storage and physical topology recommendations</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;PingBack from &lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/03/21/physical-storage-and-physical-topology-recommendations-2/"&gt;http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2008/03/21/physical-storage-and-physical-topology-recommendations-2/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8330374" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>