http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cjacks/archive/2007/12/05/don-t-version-lie-to-groove.aspxI'm working with a customer on their migration from Windows 2000 to Windows Vista. And, as you might expect, they have built up quite a collection of software that explicitly checks to see if it is running on Windows 2000. Not Windows 2000 or higher,en-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cjacks/archive/2007/12/05/don-t-version-lie-to-groove.aspx#7425208Mon, 04 Feb 2008 06:37:49 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7425208Ganesh.<p>Thanks for this post! </p> <p>I was looking into this over a week trying to find out why groove was on the stack trace,wish I had come here before.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7425208" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cjacks/archive/2007/12/05/don-t-version-lie-to-groove.aspx#6667473Wed, 05 Dec 2007 18:32:38 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:6667473MSDN Blog Postings » Don't (Version) Lie to Groove<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/12/05/dont-version-lie-to-groove/">http://msdnrss.thecoderblogs.com/2007/12/05/dont-version-lie-to-groove/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=6667473" width="1" height="1">