http://blogs.msdn.com/b/codeanalysis/archive/2004/02/10/faq-why-does-fxcop-generate-violations-against-itself-michael-fanning.aspxWe recently received a question regarding why FxCop violations occur against itself. This topic has already been partly covered by http://weblogs.asp.net/fxcop/archive/2004/01/08/48853.aspx but since there are a few FxCop-specific details for this varianten-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/codeanalysis/archive/2004/02/10/faq-why-does-fxcop-generate-violations-against-itself-michael-fanning.aspx#3810498Wed, 11 Jul 2007 09:15:59 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:3810498The Visual Studio Code Analysis Team Blog<p>Find answers to commonly asked questions about Visual Studio Code Analysis. General FAQ: Why is FxCop</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=3810498" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/codeanalysis/archive/2004/02/10/faq-why-does-fxcop-generate-violations-against-itself-michael-fanning.aspx#71135Wed, 11 Feb 2004 09:45:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:71135overflow<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=71135" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/codeanalysis/archive/2004/02/10/faq-why-does-fxcop-generate-violations-against-itself-michael-fanning.aspx#71018Wed, 11 Feb 2004 01:37:00 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:71018AndrewSevenIn our last internal release, we reviewed every existing violation and made an explicit decision not to fix each one we shipped. <br> <br>That reads kind of funny :) <br> <br>I'm eagerly awaiting the next public release. <br> <br>How about <br>5. We leave some in our app so that you can be comfortable leaving some in your app.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=71018" width="1" height="1">