<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Conor vs. SQL</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/</link><description>Conor Cunningham&amp;#39;s blog on SQL Server, data-driven applications, and pretty much whatever other random stuff he decides to post.</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Debug Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>Conor vs. SQLBits X Slide Decks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/04/03/conor-vs-sqlbits-x-slide-decks.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2012 01:11:13 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10290579</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10290579</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/04/03/conor-vs-sqlbits-x-slide-decks.aspx#comments</comments><description>Thanks for all who attended SQLBits last weekend and for those of you who attended my talks. I had three talks this time at SQLBits, including the technical keynote on Saturday.&amp;#160; I’ve attached these decks for your reference here: Making DW Easy ppt...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/04/03/conor-vs-sqlbits-x-slide-decks.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10290579" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Traceflags</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/22/conor-vs-traceflags.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:20:21 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10271096</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10271096</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/22/conor-vs-traceflags.aspx#comments</comments><description>I got a question from a reader asking me to explain various cases for the use of one of our traceflags.&amp;#160; The flag in question doesn’t matter per se (the only official documentation on the flag, 2301, is at http://support.microsoft.com/kb/920093 ...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/22/conor-vs-traceflags.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10271096" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SQL Azure Pricing</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/14/conor-vs-sql-azure-pricing.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:47:30 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10267759</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10267759</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/14/conor-vs-sql-azure-pricing.aspx#comments</comments><description>New Pricing for SQL Azure is out today (and it is cheaper on storage): http://www.windowsazure.com/en-us/pricing/details/...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/14/conor-vs-sql-azure-pricing.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10267759" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. window functions, sequence/ranking functions order-of-operations</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/02/conor-vs-window-functions-sequence-ranking-functions-order-of-operations.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 02:15:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10263493</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10263493</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/02/conor-vs-window-functions-sequence-ranking-functions-order-of-operations.aspx#comments</comments><description>We had a customer issue today that ended up being by-design but was confusing enough that I offered to write up a blog post so that people could reference it in the future.&amp;#160; It boils down to the question “when should ROW_NUMBER() be computed in a...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/02/02/conor-vs-window-functions-sequence-ranking-functions-order-of-operations.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10263493" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SqlBits Spring 2012</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/30/conor-vs-sqlbits-spring-2012.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 22:49:57 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10261969</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10261969</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/30/conor-vs-sqlbits-spring-2012.aspx#comments</comments><description>For those interested, I will be speaking at the SqlBits conference in London, UK at the end of March.&amp;#160; I’ll be giving the Saturday keynote (on the new Batch processing engine in SQL 2012 used with Column Store indexes) and 2 other talks (one on Data...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/30/conor-vs-sqlbits-spring-2012.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10261969" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SQL Azure Resource Usage</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/16/conor-vs-sql-azure-resource-usage.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:43:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10257202</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10257202</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/16/conor-vs-sql-azure-resource-usage.aspx#comments</comments><description>For those of you watching SQL Azure, you probably have noticed that it releases more frequently than regular SQL Server.&amp;#160; There was a release in late November/early December (it is complicated since the installation of the new software is done largely...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/16/conor-vs-sql-azure-resource-usage.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10257202" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. ColumnStore Index Stats</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/09/conor-vs-columnstore-index-stats.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 18:40:18 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10254669</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10254669</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/09/conor-vs-columnstore-index-stats.aspx#comments</comments><description>&amp;#160; I haven’t posted much on the new SQL Server 2012 features yet, but I’m going to start doing so soon.&amp;#160; I’ll also be speaking about them at upcoming conferences.&amp;#160; We have an exciting new index type in SQL Server 2012 that is column-oriented...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/09/conor-vs-columnstore-index-stats.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10254669" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Distributed Query Provider Hints</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/09/conor-vs-distributed-query-provider-hints.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 14:55:19 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10254579</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10254579</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/09/conor-vs-distributed-query-provider-hints.aspx#comments</comments><description>(I promised I’d write more ) Today I will talk a bit about Distributed Query (DQ), a feature that lets you query across databases/servers.&amp;#160; I’ve previously posted an academic paper we wrote on the subject some time back ( http://citeseerx.ist.psu...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/09/conor-vs-distributed-query-provider-hints.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10254579" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SQL Azure/SQL Server 2012</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/04/conor-vs-sql-azure-sql-server-2012.aspx</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 14:16:04 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10253038</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10253038</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/04/conor-vs-sql-azure-sql-server-2012.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’m not one for New Year’s Resolutions, but I am going to try to blog a bit more.&amp;#160; It’s hard to describe working at Microsoft, especially as one gets more senior.&amp;#160; There are lots of really smart people.&amp;#160; There’s an ability to work on problems...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2012/01/04/conor-vs-sql-azure-sql-server-2012.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10253038" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Extended Events</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/12/16/conor-vs-extended-events.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 17:46:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10248649</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10248649</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/12/16/conor-vs-extended-events.aspx#comments</comments><description>I have been playing with the XEvent feature in SQL 2012 (RC0) and there are a few gotchas that I hit.&amp;#160; I figured I’d post them up here so that others could learn from my experiences.&amp;#160; I was trying to do something pretty simple – get the % Processor...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/12/16/conor-vs-extended-events.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10248649" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Synergija Slide Decks</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/10/24/conor-vs-synergija-slide-decks.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 19:17:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10229445</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10229445</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/10/24/conor-vs-synergija-slide-decks.aspx#comments</comments><description>I had a great time visiting Belgrade last week.&amp;#160; I’d like to thank everyone who attended one of my talks and I wanted to post up the slide decks for those who would like to see them.&amp;#160; One talk was on the new SQL 2012 ColumnStore index feature...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/10/24/conor-vs-synergija-slide-decks.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10229445" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Sinergija 2011</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/10/07/conor-vs-sinergija-2011.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 14:30:38 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10221691</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10221691</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/10/07/conor-vs-sinergija-2011.aspx#comments</comments><description>As a professional announcement, I will not be speaking at PASS this year (nor will I be at the conference).&amp;#160; Instead, I will be in Belgrade, Serbia the following week to speak at the Sinergija 11 conference.&amp;#160; I’ll be doing a talk on the new...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/10/07/conor-vs-sinergija-2011.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10221691" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Max Server Memory</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/09/30/conor-vs-max-server-memory.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:00:40 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10218656</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10218656</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/09/30/conor-vs-max-server-memory.aspx#comments</comments><description>&amp;#160; Question (paraphrased):&amp;#160; “Conor, does changing the max server memory settings always empty the plan cache on SQL 2005 and 2008?” Answer: yes, this is what happens and what is supposed to happen.&amp;#160; One of the inputs to the optimizer is...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/09/30/conor-vs-max-server-memory.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10218656" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SQL Saturday Austin</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/09/27/conor-vs-sql-saturday-austin.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:44:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10217257</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10217257</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/09/27/conor-vs-sql-saturday-austin.aspx#comments</comments><description>I'll be talking about one of the new things our team has been develping this Saturday at the SQL Saturday event in Austin ( http://www.sqlsaturday.com/97/eventhome.aspx) on the new ColumnStore index being added in the upcoming release of SQL Server. It...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/09/27/conor-vs-sql-saturday-austin.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10217257" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/SQL/">SQL</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/Index/">Index</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/Data+Warehouse/">Data Warehouse</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/Business+Intelligence/">Business Intelligence</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/ColumnStore/">ColumnStore</category></item><item><title>Conor vs. Parallel Execution Plan Contexts/Runtime Instances</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/06/28/conor-vs-parallel-execution-plan-contexts-runtime-instances.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 13:50:35 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10180930</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10180930</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/06/28/conor-vs-parallel-execution-plan-contexts-runtime-instances.aspx#comments</comments><description>I’ve received a question about parallel execution plans from a customer. ( http://technet.microsoft.com/en-gb/library/cc966425.aspx ) Execution contexts for parallel plans are not cached. A necessary condition for SQL Server to compile a parallel query...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/06/28/conor-vs-parallel-execution-plan-contexts-runtime-instances.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10180930" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SQLBits 2011 Brighton</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/04/11/conor-vs-sqlbits-2011-brighton.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:28:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10152018</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10152018</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/04/11/conor-vs-sqlbits-2011-brighton.aspx#comments</comments><description>Here is the slide deck from my presentation at SQLBits Friday in Brighton file &amp;#160; I had a great time at SQLBits, even though I had to leave early.&amp;#160; Thank you to everyone who attended the talk and to those who asked questions and gave me feedback...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/04/11/conor-vs-sqlbits-2011-brighton.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10152018" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. SQLBits (United Kingdom)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/04/03/conor-vs-sqlbits-united-kingdom.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 23:47:06 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10149345</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10149345</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/04/03/conor-vs-sqlbits-united-kingdom.aspx#comments</comments><description>I will be in Brighton, England this upcoming Friday where I will be speaking at the SQLBits conference.&amp;#160; I plan to give a talk that goes deep into how many SQL Server processes Update queries (Insert, Update, Delete).&amp;#160; So, if you’ve ever wanted...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/04/03/conor-vs-sqlbits-united-kingdom.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10149345" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Map-Reduce vs. Databases</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/02/11/conor-vs-map-reduce-vs-databases.aspx</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:06:07 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10128271</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>1</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10128271</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/02/11/conor-vs-map-reduce-vs-databases.aspx#comments</comments><description>I found this paper interesting, so you might too.&amp;#160; It covers some of the differences between parallel database systems and map-reduce style computation: http://database.cs.brown.edu/papers/stonebraker-cacm2010.pdf Happy Querying! Conor...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/02/11/conor-vs-map-reduce-vs-databases.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10128271" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Views/Tables</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/01/31/conor-vs-views-tables.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:22:16 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10122409</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10122409</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/01/31/conor-vs-views-tables.aspx#comments</comments><description>I received an email from a reader this weekend that has a lot of different questions, but one of the main questions related to the difference between views and base tables in SQL Server’s plan generation process.&amp;#160; ie if I have a view “select * from...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/01/31/conor-vs-views-tables.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10122409" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/SQL/">SQL</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/Distributed+Query/">Distributed Query</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/View/">View</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/Query+Optimization/">Query Optimization</category><category domain="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/tags/SQL+Server/">SQL Server</category></item><item><title>Conor vs. How I got into computers…</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/01/01/conor-vs-how-i-got-into-computers.aspx</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Jan 2011 02:02:52 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10110849</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>2</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10110849</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/01/01/conor-vs-how-i-got-into-computers.aspx#comments</comments><description>I thought I’d do a small post about some of the reasons I got into computers since I’ve randomly had a few opportunities to revisit them.&amp;#160; Tron 2 came out recently, reminding me of the original movie.&amp;#160; Additionally, I went home for the holidays...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2011/01/01/conor-vs-how-i-got-into-computers.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10110849" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. more SARGable predicates</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/12/18/conor-vs-more-sargable-predicates.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:51:14 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10106830</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>7</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10106830</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/12/18/conor-vs-more-sargable-predicates.aspx#comments</comments><description>I got another question in the mail this week from another reader: &amp;#160; Hi Conor Thanks for an interesting blog. Maybe you have the answer to this question: Why I SQL Server having performance problems with these types of expressions: --------------...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/12/18/conor-vs-more-sargable-predicates.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10106830" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Join Search Space</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/12/18/conor-vs-join-search-space.aspx</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 16:18:47 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10106828</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10106828</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/12/18/conor-vs-join-search-space.aspx#comments</comments><description>I received a question this week from a reader about how SQL Server determines the join order if there are more than 6 joins in a query. There are a lot of details about how SQL Server’s optimizer works here, and some of them are beyond the level of detail...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/12/18/conor-vs-join-search-space.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10106828" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. Row Growth in Read Committed Snapshot Isolation</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/16/conor-vs-row-growth-in-read-committed-snapshot-isolation.aspx</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 19:23:59 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10092120</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>0</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10092120</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/16/conor-vs-row-growth-in-read-committed-snapshot-isolation.aspx#comments</comments><description>At PASS last week, I was asked about fragmentation caused by RCSI when a row is first converted to use RCSI. I talked to some people in the team and found that one of my colleagues had already written a nice blog entry about it. http://blogs.msdn.com...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/16/conor-vs-row-growth-in-read-committed-snapshot-isolation.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10092120" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. PASS (Slide Decks)</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/15/conor-vs-pass-slide-decks.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Nov 2010 17:32:17 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10091358</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>4</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10091358</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/15/conor-vs-pass-slide-decks.aspx#comments</comments><description>I had a great time at PASS last week and got to talk to a lot of wonderful customers- thank you! As promised, here are the decks: Update Talk Performance Troubleshooting Talk Happy Querying! Conor...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/15/conor-vs-pass-slide-decks.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10091358" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>Conor vs. PASS</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/08/conor-vs-pass.aspx</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 15:35:10 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10087632</guid><dc:creator>Conor Cunningham [MSFT]</dc:creator><slash:comments>3</slash:comments><wfw:commentRss xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/rsscomments.aspx?WeblogPostID=10087632</wfw:commentRss><comments>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/08/conor-vs-pass.aspx#comments</comments><description>It’s one of the most exciting weeks of the year to be a SQL Server junkie – PASS is this week in Seattle! I’m giving a talk on the many details of Update queries.&amp;#160; It will cover the various operators and how they work, why the plan shapes look the...(&lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2010/11/08/conor-vs-pass.aspx"&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10087632" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
