http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2009/05/25/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2.aspxThanks to those of you who replied to my previous post.&#160; I spent the last week or so talking with customers, coworkers, and looking at various applications to see how recompiles are modeled today in their applications.&#160; At a high level, SQLen-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2009/05/25/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2.aspx#9640753Mon, 25 May 2009 21:58:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9640753Conor vs. Recompiles, part 2 | Coded Style<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.codedstyle.com/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2-2/">http://www.codedstyle.com/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2-2/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9640753" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/conor_cunningham_msft/archive/2009/05/25/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2.aspx#9640752Mon, 25 May 2009 21:58:27 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9640752Conor vs. Recompiles, part 2 | Coded Style<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.codedstyle.com/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2/">http://www.codedstyle.com/conor-vs-recompiles-part-2/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9640752" width="1" height="1">