<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>SF/JavaOne, Day 4, Speculative Locking</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cyrusn/archive/2005/06/29/434028.aspx</link><description>Extremely interesting talk today about making a highly scalable VM for
java that can handle a high number of threads far better than the
current VMs out there. What's better than that? It runs
your code better without requiring you to change any of</description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><generator>Telligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)</generator><item><title>re: SF/JavaOne, Day 4, Speculative Locking</title><link>http://blogs.msdn.com/b/cyrusn/archive/2005/06/29/434028.aspx#435247</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2005 12:41:23 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:435247</guid><dc:creator>damien morton</dc:creator><description>interesting - a friend pointed the following paper out to me and i thought of your post on speculative locking.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://dal.i.am/cs/fp/ea8-composablememory_stm.pdf"&gt;http://dal.i.am/cs/fp/ea8-composablememory_stm.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=435247" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>