.NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Rajesh — Tue, 25 Dec 2007 12:25:03 GMT

j2ee &.net which one is best? &which one is mostly used in world?

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Donna Thompson — Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:20:43 GMT

<h1><a href="http://advertisersworld.com/buy-tamiflu-on-line/">buy">http://advertisersworld.com/buy-tamiflu-on-line/">buy tamiflu on line</a> http://advertisersworld.com/buy-tamiflu-on-line/ [URL=http://advertisersworld.com/buy-tamiflu-on-line/]buy tamiflu on line[/URL] [URL]http://advertisersworld.com/buy-tamiflu-on-line/[/URL]</h1>

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Dr. No — Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:59:00 GMT

Rank-and-file procedural programmers are dying off in the business world. OO has taken its lumps; and we've learned from it. It's time to move on to the next great thing (AOP?).

C# and Java are just languages. It's the overall architecture of the platform that carries weight. So what's the point of debating anything else under the ".Net beats J2EE" heading?

The current offshoring phenom has all but cinched the acceptance of POJO+Hibernate et al/J2EE in many companies -- particularly in part because Linux servers appear to be popping up at many MS sites (at least in my area).

.Net has one app server, one OS and one IDE... should I repeat that? It sounds really inane, doesn't it. I find that the only managers who like to be locked into something like that are the ones who need to be spoon-fed; especially when it comes time to explaining why shit breaks.

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

dianying xia zai — Mon, 02 Aug 2004 06:54:00 GMT

[href=http://www.dmoz.net.cn/ wangzhidaquang]
[href=http://www.86dmoz.com/ jingpingwangzhi]
[href=http://movie.kamun.com/ mianfeidianying]
[href=http://www.kamun.com/ dianyingxiazai]
[href=http://music.kamun.com/ MP3 free download]
[href=http://www.pc530.net/ diannaoaihaozhe]
[href=http://www.5icc.com/ duangxingcaixingxiazha]
[href=http://www.dianyingxiazai.com/ dianyingxiazai]
[href=http://www.yinyuexiazai.com/ yinyuexiazai]

56 : 44 f

{ shinja.net } blog — Fri, 16 Jul 2004 12:28:00 GMT

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Dan Fernandez — Tue, 25 May 2004 20:56:00 GMT

My point is that .NET is succeeding in the marketplace. This is just one proof point and it's particularly important because the survey is on enterprise customers. According to the competition, Microsoft doesn't play in the enterprise. This proves otherwise and shows that customers are making a future investment in .NET technology. This is just one proof point among many. .NET is successful and will continue to be. The whole world is *not* going to Java, and this is just another way to open people's eyes to the popularity of .NET.

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Jay — Tue, 25 May 2004 15:28:00 GMT

Oh, and it turns out the base for the survey above is of only 322 companies, most of whom are doing mixed work, and these are just opinions, not actual usage...so, it points again to the question: what's your point? since most companies were doing their work using VB/ASP before, it simply makes sense for most to drop those and go to vb.net/asp.net

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Jay — Fri, 21 May 2004 02:36:00 GMT

Well, a lot of the "new" jobs in ".NET" are simply the result of jobs lost in VB and ASP. So yes, in the long run, that Job market will grow larger as more jobs are lost on the VB and old-Mcrosoft tech end.

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Joku — Wed, 19 May 2004 21:45:00 GMT

- Do you still think .NET is “not yet?“

Well forgetting all the research, giving my entirely subjective personal impression

.NET is now but not _here_ atleast in great numbers. From the open job offerings I just checked there was .NET/VB.NET/C# mentioned in around 10% of those which can be compared to each other. There's definetely growth, last I checked (long ago) there were none to speak of. Actually I'm surprised there's even that 10% (rough impression I got, not calculated) as _here_ we are notoriously slow in finding any use for new technologies (except for cellphones and text messaging).

re: .NET beats J2EE for development work in 2004

Jay — Sun, 16 May 2004 05:03:00 GMT

"Given that our customers are going to be running in a heterogenous environment, our goal is to make it as painless as possible to interoperate in a heterogenous world. That's our unique value and why we are investing so much in this area."

Well, then I guess if you care so much about your customers, then let them use J2EE. That way, everything will integrate well with everything else ;-)