As I’ve wrote about previously , I’ve flipped the bit on Oslo and I’m currently very excited about the long term prospects for the technology. Like many have wrote about in the blogosphere, I was initially skeptical about Oslo. Seeing the demos for modeling...

The Oslo team released the May 2009 CTP yesterday. For those that are interested in Oslo in general, and System.Identity in particular, then effort to get the new CTP up and running is well worth it. From the perspective of System.Identity, the new Oslo...

As I really don’t have much of a life I was reading an academic paper this evening by Anneke Kleppe . In the References section of the paper there were the a couple of links to some articles on properly implementing UML Associations in source code. The...

In Part 1 of this series we covered the basics of how Oslo’s System.Identity implements the Party Model and how System.Identity can be used to model real world scenarios. We continued our exploration of System.Identity in Part 2 by modeling more complex...

In Part 1 of this series we discussed the basics of the Party Model using Oslo’s System.Identity schema. Specifically, we discussed the System.Identity constructs for Party, Role (including the Employee and Customer specializations of Role), and TaxonomyEntry...

It occurred to me the other day that I asserted that the Party Model is a “Good Thing” without providing any proof whatsoever to back up my claim. While I would love to believe that everyone subscribes to my views and opinions because of their irrefutable...

There does exist some controversy right now in the blogosphere around Oslo . As I indicated previously , I’ve done a 180 on Oslo and I am now highly interested in the technology – a subject I plan to blog about soon. However, what I find interesting is...