http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david_leblanc/archive/2008/02/15/hd-vs-blu-ray.aspxOK, so this isn't security related at all, just felt like grumbling about the latest development. If you're not interested in my thoughts on this, skip it now. A few years ago, I remodeled my basement, and took an odd room with only one window and wireden-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david_leblanc/archive/2008/02/15/hd-vs-blu-ray.aspx#7735765Sat, 16 Feb 2008 17:48:31 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7735765Rosyna<P>Actually, HD DVD is technically inferior in every way to BD. It's not just an issue of space on the disc. Many of the things considered "superior" on the HD DVD by the HD DVD side are actually workarounds necessary due to the low maximum bit-rate of HD DVD and how it handles multiple audio tracks (this is why the Harry Potter BD release has 12 audio/language tracks compared to the HD DVD's 3 audio tracks)</P> <P>But the entire thing is moot, even Toshiba is pulling out of HD DVD. <A href="http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL1627196120080216" target=_new rel=nofollow>http://www.reuters.com/article/companyNewsAndPR/idUSL1627196120080216</A></P> <P>[dcl] The storage media is one thing, the player is another. HD-DVD players generally meet Blu-ray spec 2.0 right now, but very few players support the 2.0 spec, and those that do are very expensive.</P><div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7735765" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david_leblanc/archive/2008/02/15/hd-vs-blu-ray.aspx#7726406Sat, 16 Feb 2008 04:43:03 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:7726406BioSensorAB » HD vs. Blu-Ray<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.biosensorab.org/2008/02/15/hd-vs-blu-ray/">http://www.biosensorab.org/2008/02/15/hd-vs-blu-ray/</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=7726406" width="1" height="1">