http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david_leblanc/archive/2008/04/21/more-on-checking-allocations.aspxSeems my last post met with some objections – somewhat rightfully so, as I mischaracterized one of Tom's points – he never advocated just not checking for allocations, but instead to use an allocator that has a non-returning error handler – though iten-USTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david_leblanc/archive/2008/04/21/more-on-checking-allocations.aspx#10183855Thu, 07 Jul 2011 00:00:09 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:10183855Yuhong Bao<p>Don&#39;t forget this:</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://support.microsoft.com/kb/284893">support.microsoft.com/.../284893</a></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=10183855" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/david_leblanc/archive/2008/04/21/more-on-checking-allocations.aspx#8415886Tue, 22 Apr 2008 05:43:34 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:8415886Microsoft news and tips &raquo; More on Checking Allocations<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://microsoftnews.askpcdoc.com/?p=3606">http://microsoftnews.askpcdoc.com/?p=3606</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=8415886" width="1" height="1">