http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2006/05/05/three-weeks-since-we-shipped-must-be-time-to-ship-again-quot-atlas-quot-control-toolkit-updated.aspxAs you may already know, we released the "Atlas" Control Toolkit a few weeks ago to almost universally positive feedback . But it's hard to please everyone, and we got some negative feedback on our relative lack of support for Apple's Safari web browserenTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2006/05/05/three-weeks-since-we-shipped-must-be-time-to-ship-again-quot-atlas-quot-control-toolkit-updated.aspx#603623Mon, 22 May 2006 10:26:34 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:603623ScottGu's BlogI blogged about the Atlas Control Toolkit three weeks ago when it first shipped.&amp;amp;nbsp; There are three...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=603623" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2006/05/05/three-weeks-since-we-shipped-must-be-time-to-ship-again-quot-atlas-quot-control-toolkit-updated.aspx#594851Wed, 10 May 2006 23:45:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:594851David AnsonRecon_609, <br> <br>Interesting question... :) On the one hand, effortless browser compatibility is nice, but on the other hand keeping your external dependencies to a minimum is nice, too. I don't know what your validator does, but I'm thinking that validators are, in general, pretty simple and so I think my approach would be to avoid pulling in Atlas in this case. Maybe if it turns out that you're doing a lot of browser-specific workarounds it would be good to reconsider, but my guess is that you won't have any/too many. <br> <br>Good luck!<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=594851" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2006/05/05/three-weeks-since-we-shipped-must-be-time-to-ship-again-quot-atlas-quot-control-toolkit-updated.aspx#594780Wed, 10 May 2006 22:06:14 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:594780Recon_609Thanks for the update. <br> <br>I have a custom validator control I built (inherits from BaseValidator). <br> <br>Would using a control extender be a better approach? &nbsp;I was thinking that the custom javascript - if written with Atlas would help provide better browser compatibility.<div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=594780" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2006/05/05/three-weeks-since-we-shipped-must-be-time-to-ship-again-quot-atlas-quot-control-toolkit-updated.aspx#591270Sat, 06 May 2006 06:19:40 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:591270Christopher SteenAttempting to address Rajesh's concerns about <br>optionality... [Via: Tim Ewald ] <br>Axis2 1.0 released...<img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=591270" width="1" height="1">