http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspxKind reader (and fellow Silverlight Charting blogger!) Pete Brown contacted me recently to report that my SilverlightDefaultStyleBrowser application (background reading available here , here , here , here , and here ) didn't seem to be working for assembliesenTelligent Evolution Platform Developer Build (Build: 5.6.50428.7875)http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9416266Fri, 13 Feb 2009 02:44:32 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9416266Rik Robinson's Blog<p>Tonight's recipient of my UI Rant is the Silverlight 2 ListBox, or more specifically, the ListBoxItem.&amp;#160;</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9416266" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9395858Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:02:29 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9395858Microsoft Weblogs<p>When we created Silverlight Charting (background reading here and here ), we tried to make things as</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9395858" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9234927Thu, 18 Dec 2008 10:33:38 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9234927David Anson<p>In case anyone's following along here, Valentin and I have chatted a bit in email and he prefers that I not add Telerik-specific code to SilverlightDefaultStyleBrowser to make it work with the current RadControls assemblies. He notes that this is actually a more general issue with the way RadControls generic.xaml is written that causes similar styling issues in Blend - and that Telerik is looking into ways they can improve the experience for both Blend and SilverlightDefaultStyleBrowser. I, for one, am looking forward to it! :)</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9234927" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9230362Wed, 17 Dec 2008 09:24:49 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9230362David Anson<p>divil,</p> <p>A very quick check just now suggests that the latest version of SilverlightDefaultStyleBrowser works just fine with SandDock. If you have experience to the contrary, please let me know what's not working for you. Thank you!</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9230362" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9221929Mon, 15 Dec 2008 21:51:56 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9221929vgsbs<p>Hello David,</p> <p>I send you an email with a follow-up on this post.</p> <p>Regards,</p> <p>Valentin Stoychev</p> <p>Telerik, Inc.</p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9221929" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9221199Mon, 15 Dec 2008 19:14:48 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9221199Community Blogs<p>In this issue: Michael Washington &amp;amp; Jeff Paries, Lutz Gerhard, Jeff Wilcox, and David Anson. Shoutout</p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9221199" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9220862Mon, 15 Dec 2008 17:34:28 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9220862divil<p>Does the style browser work with SandDock for Silverlight? It's a pretty popular third-party control suite for Silverlight.</p> <p><a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://www.divelements.co.uk/net/controls/sanddocksl">http://www.divelements.co.uk/net/controls/sanddocksl</a></p> <div style="clear:both;"></div><img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9220862" width="1" height="1">http://blogs.msdn.com/b/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx#9220399Mon, 15 Dec 2008 15:28:33 GMT91d46819-8472-40ad-a661-2c78acb4018c:9220399Delay's Blog : Expanded access to Silverlight 2's generic.xaml resources [SilverlightDefaultStyleBrowser updated for better compatibility!]<p>PingBack from <a rel="nofollow" target="_new" href="http://blogs.msdn.com/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx">http://blogs.msdn.com/delay/archive/2008/12/14/expanded-access-to-silverlight-2-s-generic-xaml-resources-silverlightdefaultstylebrowser-updated-for-better-compatibility.aspx</a></p> <img src="http://blogs.msdn.com/aggbug.aspx?PostID=9220399" width="1" height="1">