LINQ to SQL: What is NOT in RTM (V1)

Visual Studio 2008 LINQ to SQL 的Beta 2测试版和RTM正式版的差异

lxy_abcde1190 — Sun, 20 Apr 2008 15:48:34 GMT

Visual Studio 2008 LINQ to SQL 的Beta 2测试版和RTM正式版的差异

曹振华 — Mon, 03 Dec 2007 04:51:12 GMT

FollowScottGuthrie的例子学习LINQ，结果找了半天也没有找到Table

LINQ to SQL - Breaking Changes in the RTM and some resources

Cristian's Blog — Sun, 28 Oct 2007 12:48:18 GMT

If you work with LINQ to SQL then you might want to take a look at this posts of Dinesh Kulkarni: LINQ

LINQ to SQL: Beta 2 to RTM Changes

Mike Taulty's Blog — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:31:02 GMT

Dinesh has a list of changes here. If you're using LINQ to SQL then this will have an impact on you....

re: LINQ to SQL: What is NOT in RTM (V1)

Jimmy Nilsson — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:25:21 GMT

Ouch, hope hadn't left me that containment should make it into RTM. (I mean support for mapping value objects/embedded types.)

To me, that's definitely a showstopper!!! If you like the "style" of DDD I would say that Value Objects are extremely important...

Cheers,

Jimmy

http://JimmyNilsson.com/blog/

###

Linq to SQL Features in RTM

Guy Burstein [MVP] — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 09:16:43 GMT

Linq to SQL Features in RTM Dinesh Kulkarni, the current program manager of Linq to SQL, has lately posted

re: LINQ to SQL: What is NOT in RTM (V1)

MSDNArchive — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 02:46:09 GMT

Of course, seeings as the rainy season just started, "a sunny day" could be months off.

LINQ to SQL: What is NOT in RTM (V1)

Linq in Action News — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:51:13 GMT

Dinesh Kulkarni , now ex-program manager on the LINQ to SQL project, gives on his blog a list of what

LINQ to SQL: What is NOT in RTM (V1)

Fabrice's weblog — Thu, 18 Oct 2007 01:51:12 GMT

Dinesh Kulkarni , now ex-program manager on the LINQ to SQL project, gives on his blog a list of what

re: LINQ to SQL: What is NOT in RTM (V1)

Dinesh Kulkarni - MSFT — Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:48:37 GMT

Anders,

As I have mentioned, we have been really busy with getting VS 2008/.NET 3.5 wrapped up and are just now really doing the next set of plans. I am not directly involved in LINQ to SQL SP1 so I will forward on your feedback and let one of my colleagues respond. However, I suspect that they won't have the answers you are looking for for a little while at least.

Thanks,

Dinesh