Follow me on Twitter...
Have a look at a my blogs on 'You Had Me At EHLO...' Protecting Exchange Data with DPM, CCR Decision Making Flowcharts, SCR Decision Making Flowcharts, On email archiving. ...and a few more here High item counts - what do you do about it?, Archive v Big Mailboxes, Getting your Exchange 2007 Project Approved, (and the follow up 7 blogs), Recovery Scenarios Part 1, Recovery Scenarios Part 2, Recovery Scenarios Part 3, How quick will DPM backup?, Synchronous or Asynchronous Replication?, Why not stretch CCR?, Backup solutions for Exchange 2007..., Do we actually need to backup Exchange?, SAN v DAS.
...and a few more here High item counts - what do you do about it?, Archive v Big Mailboxes, Getting your Exchange 2007 Project Approved, (and the follow up 7 blogs), Recovery Scenarios Part 1, Recovery Scenarios Part 2, Recovery Scenarios Part 3, How quick will DPM backup?, Synchronous or Asynchronous Replication?, Why not stretch CCR?, Backup solutions for Exchange 2007..., Do we actually need to backup Exchange?, SAN v DAS.
OK so I just wanted to add a few more ideas that are worth exploring..
Data Centre Consolidation The idea of saving money by deploying Exchange Servers in fewer locations is not a new one and something which many companies have explored; but Exchange Server 2007 does change things slightly and so this maybe worth revisiting.
The I\O footprint of an Exchange 2007 Server is lighter and responding to disk requests tends to be faster, and the offloading of some services to CAS coupled with a deployment of Outlook in cached mode means that deploying clients at the end of slower, less reliable links can provide a very acceptable client experience. If you can consolidate more mailboxes on fewer servers in fewer locations you should be able to demonstrate real cost saving…
And last but not least…
PingBack from http://www.port3101.org/port-3101-bes-admin-bar-grill/426-getting-your-exchange-2007-project-approved-part-6-few-last-ideas.html#post3385